BETZ vs. CARZ
BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and CARZ (First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - BETZ tracks the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index while CARZ tracks the NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BETZ returned -8.45%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for CARZ. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CARZ.
Performance
BETZ vs. CARZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than CARZ's 58.10% return.
BETZ
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -6.63%
- 1Y
- -5.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- -8.45%
- 10Y*
- —
CARZ
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- 18.55%
- YTD
- 58.10%
- 6M
- 63.30%
- 1Y
- 118.34%
- 3Y*
- 34.35%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.53%
BETZ vs. CARZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -9.29% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -42.02% | -3.91% | 60.54% |
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 58.10% | 37.18% | 3.26% | 42.47% | -31.25% | 18.09% | 64.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and CARZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BETZ and CARZ has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BETZ vs. CARZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BETZ
CARZ
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
BETZ
CARZ
Technology
BETZ
CARZ
Communication Services
BETZ
CARZ
Financial Services
BETZ
CARZ
-
Basic Materials
BETZ
-
CARZ
Consumer Defensive
BETZ
-
CARZ
-
Energy
BETZ
-
CARZ
-
Healthcare
BETZ
-
CARZ
-
Industrials
BETZ
-
CARZ
Real Estate
BETZ
-
CARZ
-
Utilities
BETZ
-
CARZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. CARZ — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
CARZ
BETZ vs. CARZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BETZ | CARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | 4.62 | -4.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | 5.26 | -5.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.71 | -0.73 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 8.16 | -8.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 33.04 | -33.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BETZ | CARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 4.62 | -4.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.60 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.46 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. CARZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than CARZ's maximum drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and CARZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | CARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -51.20% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -14.44% | -14.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | -27.84% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.35% | -40.30% | -20.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.64% | 0.00% | -38.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.81% | -12.90% | -20.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.93% | 3.57% | +13.36% |
Volatility
BETZ vs. CARZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 5.46%, while First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a volatility of 10.21%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | CARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 10.21% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.77% | 20.31% | -4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 25.79% | -5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 28.11% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.95% | 26.28% | +1.67% |
BETZ vs. CARZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CARZ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BETZ vs. CARZ - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than CARZ's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.04% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 1.35% | 2.13% | 1.17% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 2.25% | 0.63% | 3.23% | 2.85% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETZ and CARZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARZ has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to BETZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs CARZ's -51.20%.
On 5-year performance, CARZ leads with 16.84% vs -8.45% for BETZ. On fees, CARZ is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 16.84% return vs -8.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARZ is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.
BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 1.35% for CARZ.
BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR). They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.70% for CARZ.
CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETZ and CARZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer