PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETZ vs. CARZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BETZ vs. CARZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than CARZ's 58.10% return.


BETZ

1D
-0.47%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-9.29%
6M
-6.63%
1Y
-5.17%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
-8.45%
10Y*

CARZ

1D
2.83%
1M
18.55%
YTD
58.10%
6M
63.30%
1Y
118.34%
3Y*
34.35%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
16.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETZ vs. CARZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
-9.29%15.75%10.22%21.17%-42.02%-3.91%60.54%
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
58.10%37.18%3.26%42.47%-31.25%18.09%64.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and CARZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between BETZ and CARZ has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BETZ vs. CARZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BETZ
CARZ

Consumer Cyclical

96.4%
19.5%

Technology

2.8%
60.6%

Communication Services

0.8%
5.1%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

6.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

8.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

BETZ
96.4%
CARZ
19.5%

Technology

BETZ
2.8%
CARZ
60.6%

Communication Services

BETZ
0.8%
CARZ
5.1%

Financial Services

BETZ
0.0%
CARZ

-

Basic Materials

BETZ

-

CARZ
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

BETZ

-

CARZ

-

Energy

BETZ

-

CARZ

-

Healthcare

BETZ

-

CARZ

-

Industrials

BETZ

-

CARZ
8.1%

Real Estate

BETZ

-

CARZ

-

Utilities

BETZ

-

CARZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BETZ vs. CARZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETZ
BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CARZ
CARZ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETZ vs. CARZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BETZCARZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.25

4.62

-4.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.22

5.26

-5.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.71

-0.73

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

8.16

-8.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.38

33.04

-33.42

BETZ vs. CARZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the CARZ Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETZ and CARZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BETZCARZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

4.62

-4.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

0.60

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.46

-0.32

Drawdowns

BETZ vs. CARZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than CARZ's maximum drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and CARZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BETZCARZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.82%

-51.20%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.20%

-14.44%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.20%

-27.84%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.35%

-40.30%

-20.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.64%

0.00%

-38.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.81%

-12.90%

-20.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.93%

3.57%

+13.36%

Volatility

BETZ vs. CARZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 5.46%, while First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a volatility of 10.21%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BETZCARZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

10.21%

-4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.77%

20.31%

-4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

25.79%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.95%

28.11%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.95%

26.28%

+1.67%

BETZ vs. CARZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CARZ's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BETZ vs. CARZ - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than CARZ's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
5.04%4.57%0.86%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CARZ
First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund
1.35%2.13%1.17%1.40%1.59%2.25%0.63%3.23%2.85%2.11%2.47%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


BETZ and CARZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARZ has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to BETZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs CARZ's -51.20%.

On 5-year performance, CARZ leads with 16.84% vs -8.45% for BETZ. On fees, CARZ is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 16.84% return vs -8.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CARZ is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.

BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 1.35% for CARZ.

BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR). They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.70% for CARZ.

CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BETZ and CARZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer