BETZ vs. CARZ
BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and CARZ (First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - BETZ tracks the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index while CARZ tracks the NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BETZ returned -5.84%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for CARZ. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CARZ.
Performance
BETZ vs. CARZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -8.87% return, which is significantly lower than CARZ's 31.11% return.
BETZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- -8.87%
- 1Y
- -16.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- -5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
CARZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- YTD
- 31.11%
- 1Y
- 66.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.48K | $310.34K | $782.30K | |
| $535.60K | $505.64K | $494.01K |
BETZ vs. CARZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -8.87% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -42.02% | -3.91% | 65.99% |
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 31.11% | 37.18% | 3.26% | 42.47% | -31.25% | 18.09% | 62.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and CARZ is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BETZ and CARZ has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BETZ vs. CARZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BETZ
CARZ
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
BETZ
CARZ
Technology
BETZ
CARZ
Communication Services
BETZ
CARZ
Industrials
BETZ
CARZ
Financial Services
BETZ
CARZ
-
Basic Materials
BETZ
-
CARZ
Consumer Defensive
BETZ
-
CARZ
-
Energy
BETZ
-
CARZ
-
Healthcare
BETZ
-
CARZ
-
Real Estate
BETZ
-
CARZ
-
Utilities
BETZ
-
CARZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. CARZ — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
CARZ
BETZ vs. CARZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETZ | CARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.34 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.98 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 10.94 | -11.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. CARZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than CARZ's maximum drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and CARZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | CARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -51.20% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -21.44% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | -27.84% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.79% | -40.30% | -19.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.35% | -17.07% | -21.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -12.87% | -21.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.92% | 5.83% | +13.09% |
Volatility
BETZ vs. CARZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 5.96%, while First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund (CARZ) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | CARZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 12.06% | -6.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 27.80% | -10.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.17% | 31.88% | -10.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 29.28% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.85% | 26.77% | +1.08% |
BETZ vs. CARZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CARZ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BETZ vs. CARZ - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than CARZ's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.02% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CARZ First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund | 1.34% | 2.13% | 1.17% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 2.25% | 0.63% | 3.23% | 2.85% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETZ and CARZ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARZ has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to BETZ (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs CARZ's -51.20%.
On 5-year performance, CARZ leads with 12.78% vs -5.84% for BETZ. On fees, CARZ is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CARZ has performed better with a 12.78% return vs -5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARZ is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.
BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 1.34% for CARZ.
BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while CARZ tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Automobile (TR). They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.70% for CARZ.
CARZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETZ and CARZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer