BETE vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETE is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by ProShares, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Over the past year, BETE returned -41.25% vs 15.05% for NOBL. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BETE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

BETE vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -41.67% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 8.38% return.

BETE

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -23.42%
• YTD: -41.67%
• 6M: -41.18%
• 1Y: -41.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NOBL

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 8.38%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: 8.82%
• 5Y*: 6.42%
• 10Y*: 10.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETE vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	-41.67%	-8.17%	66.02%	36.61%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	8.38%	6.84%	6.72%	8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BETE and NOBL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.19

Return for Risk

BETE vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETE

BETE Risk / Return Rank: 4
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 4

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 39
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 38
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETE vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETE	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.74	1.32	-2.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.94	1.99	-2.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.22	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	1.66	-2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.14	4.21	-5.34

BETE vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETE Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETE and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BETE vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and NOBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETE	NOBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.75%	-35.43%	-26.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.75%	-9.11%	-52.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.75%	-1.57%	-60.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.21%	-3.48%	-18.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.38%	3.59%	+32.79%

Volatility

BETE vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) has a higher volatility of 16.09% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.45%. This indicates that BETE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETE	NOBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.09%	3.45%	+12.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.25%	8.29%	+31.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.79%	11.52%	+44.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.57%	14.39%	+42.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.57%	16.60%	+39.97%

BETE vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETE vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.76%, more than NOBL's 2.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	94.76%	68.22%	15.22%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.09%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETE and NOBL in my portfolio?

BETE and NOBL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETE or NOBL?

BETE has higher volatility (16.09%) compared to NOBL (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETE dropped -61.75% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

Which ETF is better, BETE or NOBL?

On 1-year performance, NOBL leads with 15.05% vs -41.25% for BETE. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETE or NOBL?

Over the 1-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 15.05% return vs -41.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETE or NOBL?

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETE or NOBL?

BETE has the higher dividend yield at 94.76%, compared with 2.09% for NOBL.

What is the main difference between BETE and NOBL?

BETE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NOBL is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETE and 0.35% for NOBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.