PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETE vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BETE vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BETE vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BETE
Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF
-26.05%-8.17%66.02%40.23%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.32%6.84%6.72%9.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -26.05% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 2.32% return.


BETE

1D
1.38%
1M
1.51%
YTD
-26.05%
6M
-47.68%
1Y
-5.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NOBL

1D
-0.04%
1M
-6.79%
YTD
2.32%
6M
4.06%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BETE vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BETE vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETE
BETE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETE vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BETENOBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.09

0.41

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.30

0.70

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.09

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

0.54

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.06

1.89

-1.95

BETE vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETE Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETE and NOBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BETENOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

0.41

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.64

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between BETE and NOBL is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BETE vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.31%, more than NOBL's 2.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BETE
Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF
80.31%68.22%15.22%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.14%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Drawdowns

BETE vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and NOBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BETENOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.31%

-35.43%

-20.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.31%

-11.20%

-45.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.51%

-7.07%

-44.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.52%

-3.45%

-16.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.99%

3.18%

+23.81%

Volatility

BETE vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) has a higher volatility of 16.07% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.55%. This indicates that BETE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BETENOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.07%

3.55%

+12.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.91%

8.06%

+36.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.78%

15.24%

+43.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.59%

14.39%

+43.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.59%

16.59%

+41.00%