BETE vs. BETH
BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) and BETH (ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares. Over the past year, BETE returned -31.23% vs -37.13% for BETH. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
BETE vs. BETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -31.27% return, which is significantly lower than BETH's -26.73% return.
BETE
- 1D
- -5.45%
- 1M
- -16.23%
- YTD
- -31.27%
- 6M
- -32.93%
- 1Y
- -31.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETH
- 1D
- -5.96%
- 1M
- -15.22%
- YTD
- -26.73%
- 6M
- -29.49%
- 1Y
- -37.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETE vs. BETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | -31.27% | -8.17% | 66.02% | 40.23% |
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF | -26.73% | -11.20% | 85.03% | 42.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETE and BETH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.97 |
The correlation between BETE and BETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETE vs. BETH — Risk / Return Rank
BETE
BETH
BETE vs. BETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BETE | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | -0.80 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | -1.04 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.88 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | -0.71 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | -1.22 | +0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BETE | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | -0.80 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.44 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
BETE vs. BETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, which is greater than BETH's maximum drawdown of -52.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and BETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETE | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.31% | -52.55% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.31% | -52.55% | -3.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.93% | -50.48% | -4.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.31% | -17.55% | -3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.27% | 30.53% | +2.74% |
Volatility
BETE vs. BETH - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) have volatilities of 9.48% and 9.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETE | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.48% | 9.73% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.58% | 36.85% | +3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.80% | 46.72% | +8.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.46% | 51.18% | +5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.46% | 51.18% | +5.28% |
BETE vs. BETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BETE and BETH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
BETE vs. BETH - Dividend Comparison
BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.41%, more than BETH's 55.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | 80.41% | 68.22% | 15.22% | 0.78% |
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF | 55.77% | 57.68% | 19.71% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BETE and BETH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BETH has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to BETE (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETE dropped -56.31% vs BETH's -52.55%.
On 1-year performance, BETE leads with -31.23% vs -37.13% for BETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BETE has been the lower-risk option at 9.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BETE has performed better with a -31.23% return vs -37.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BETE and BETH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BETE has the higher dividend yield at 80.41%, compared with 55.77% for BETH.
BETE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETE and BETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer