PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETE vs. BETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BETE vs. BETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -31.27% return, which is significantly lower than BETH's -26.73% return.


BETE

1D
-5.45%
1M
-16.23%
YTD
-31.27%
6M
-32.93%
1Y
-31.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BETH

1D
-5.96%
1M
-15.22%
YTD
-26.73%
6M
-29.49%
1Y
-37.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETE vs. BETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BETE
Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF
-31.27%-8.17%66.02%40.23%
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
-26.73%-11.20%85.03%42.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BETE and BETH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023

0.97

The correlation between BETE and BETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BETE vs. BETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETE
BETE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BETH
BETH Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETE vs. BETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BETEBETHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.57

-0.80

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.57

-1.04

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.88

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

-0.71

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.96

-1.22

+0.27

BETE vs. BETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETE Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is comparable to the BETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETE and BETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BETEBETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

-0.80

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.44

-0.17

Drawdowns

BETE vs. BETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, which is greater than BETH's maximum drawdown of -52.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and BETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BETEBETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.31%

-52.55%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.31%

-52.55%

-3.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.93%

-50.48%

-4.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.31%

-17.55%

-3.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.27%

30.53%

+2.74%

Volatility

BETE vs. BETH - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) have volatilities of 9.48% and 9.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BETEBETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.48%

9.73%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.58%

36.85%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.80%

46.72%

+8.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.46%

51.18%

+5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.46%

51.18%

+5.28%

BETE vs. BETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BETE and BETH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

BETE vs. BETH - Dividend Comparison

BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.41%, more than BETH's 55.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BETE
Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF
80.41%68.22%15.22%0.78%
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
55.77%57.68%19.71%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, BETE and BETH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BETH has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to BETE (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETE dropped -56.31% vs BETH's -52.55%.

On 1-year performance, BETE leads with -31.23% vs -37.13% for BETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BETE has been the lower-risk option at 9.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BETE has performed better with a -31.23% return vs -37.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BETE and BETH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BETE has the higher dividend yield at 80.41%, compared with 55.77% for BETH.

BETE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BETE and BETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer