BEMB vs. EMLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC).
BEMB and EMLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BEMB is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Feb 22, 2023. EMLC is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010.
Performance
BEMB vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BEMB vs. EMLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | -1.14% | 12.27% | 5.51% | 8.88% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | -1.30% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 9.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEMB achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly higher than EMLC's -1.30% return.
BEMB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 7.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMLC
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 12.42%
- 3Y*
- 6.35%
- 5Y*
- 1.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BEMB vs. EMLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEMB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLC's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BEMB vs. EMLC — Risk / Return Rank
BEMB
EMLC
BEMB vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BEMB | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 1.76 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.39 | -0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.01 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 8.67 | -0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEMB | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.76 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.10 | +1.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between BEMB and EMLC is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BEMB vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison
BEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, more than EMLC's 6.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 6.99% | 6.88% | 6.31% | 5.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.16% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
Drawdowns
BEMB vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEMB drawdown since its inception was -6.17%, smaller than the maximum EMLC drawdown of -32.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEMB and EMLC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEMB | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -32.43% | +26.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.70% | -6.19% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -6.39% | +3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -14.47% | +13.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 1.44% | -0.51% |
Volatility
BEMB vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) is 2.37%, while VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that BEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BEMB | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 3.73% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 5.07% | -1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.46% | 7.10% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 9.11% | -3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 10.13% | -4.21% |