BEMB vs. BINC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC).

BEMB and BINC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BEMB is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Feb 22, 2023. BINC is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 19, 2023.

Performance

BEMB vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BEMB vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	-1.14%	12.27%	5.51%	8.42%
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	-0.50%	7.57%	5.76%	7.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEMB achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than BINC's -0.50% return.

BEMB

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -2.24%
• YTD: -1.14%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: 7.70%
• 3Y*: 7.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BINC

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: -0.50%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 5.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEMB vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEMB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

BEMB

Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF

Return for Risk

BEMB vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEMB

BEMB Risk / Return Rank: 75
BEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 75

BINC

BINC Risk / Return Rank: 82
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 90
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEMB vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BEMB	BINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.79	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.36	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	2.00	+0.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.57	8.16	+0.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BEMB vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEMB and BINC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEMB	BINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	1.79	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	2.32	-0.93

Correlation

The correlation between BEMB and BINC is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BEMB vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

BEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.99%, more than BINC's 5.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	6.99%	6.88%	6.31%	5.46%
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	5.92%	5.86%	6.14%	3.13%

Drawdowns

BEMB vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEMB drawdown since its inception was -6.17%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEMB and BINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEMB	BINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-2.69%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.70%	-2.69%	-1.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.58%	-1.87%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.95%	-0.33%	-0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	0.66%	+0.27%

Volatility

BEMB vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) has a higher volatility of 2.37% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 1.29%. This indicates that BEMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEMB	BINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.37%	1.29%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.08%	1.72%	+1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.46%	2.95%	+2.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.92%	3.03%	+2.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.92%	3.03%	+2.89%