BEMB vs. SCYB
BEMB (Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. BEMB is actively managed, while SCYB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BEMB returned 7.76%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for SCYB. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BEMB charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.
Performance
BEMB vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEMB achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's 1.87% return.
BEMB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.92%
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 5.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.03K | $45.57K | $50.16K | |
| $27.25M | $28.58M | $31.43M |
BEMB vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 0.71% | 12.27% | 5.51% | 6.90% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.87% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 7.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEMB and SCYB is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023 | 0.79 |
The correlation between BEMB and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEMB vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
BEMB
SCYB
BEMB vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEMB | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 2.21 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.99 | 9.67 | -2.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEMB vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEMB drawdown since its inception was -6.17%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEMB and SCYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEMB | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -4.92% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.67% | -2.44% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.52% | -4.92% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.46% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.93% | -0.50% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.56% | +0.33% |
Volatility
BEMB vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 0.74%. This indicates that BEMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEMB | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 0.74% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.68% | 3.04% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37% | 3.75% | +0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.82% | 5.04% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.82% | 5.04% | +0.78% |
BEMB vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEMB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BEMB vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
BEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, which matches SCYB's 6.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 6.39% | 6.88% | 6.31% | 5.46% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.31% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEMB and SCYB have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEMB has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to SCYB (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEMB dropped -6.17% vs SCYB's -4.92%.
On 3-year performance, SCYB leads with 8.22% vs 7.76% for BEMB. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCYB has performed better with a 8.22% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BEMB.
BEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 6.31% for SCYB.
BEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SCYB is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BEMB and 0.03% for SCYB.
SCYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEMB and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer