BEGRX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund (BEGRX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
BEGRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 28, 1962. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
BEGRX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BEGRX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEGRX Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund | -1.99% | 25.64% | 8.64% | 15.40% | -11.70% | 16.64% | 4.07% | 22.57% | -8.84% | 12.30% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEGRX achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BEGRX having a 8.81% annualized return and FGIAX not far behind at 8.78%.
BEGRX
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 6M
- 4.07%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BEGRX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEGRX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BEGRX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
BEGRX
FGIAX
BEGRX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund (BEGRX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BEGRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.79 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 2.30 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 2.73 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 12.62 | -7.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEGRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.79 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.80 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.58 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.42 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between BEGRX and FGIAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BEGRX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
BEGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, less than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEGRX Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund | 7.00% | 6.86% | 6.89% | 6.23% | 9.91% | 6.83% | 3.36% | 2.62% | 9.94% | 3.43% | 6.10% | 8.90% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
BEGRX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEGRX drawdown since its inception was -73.56%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGRX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEGRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.56% | -49.35% | -24.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -8.29% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -21.08% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.11% | -38.02% | +0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.16% | -3.06% | -5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.78% | -7.22% | -29.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.79% | +1.16% |
Volatility
BEGRX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund (BEGRX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that BEGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BEGRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 4.15% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 7.07% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 12.28% | +2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 13.08% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 15.17% | +1.47% |