BEGRX vs. NALFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BEGRX (Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund) and NALFX (New Alternatives Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BEGRX returned 8.68%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for NALFX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BEGRX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for NALFX.

Performance

BEGRX vs. NALFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund (BEGRX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEGRX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than NALFX's 19.18% return. Over the past 10 years, BEGRX has underperformed NALFX with an annualized return of 8.68%, while NALFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.92% annualized return.

BEGRX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: 2.10%
• 1Y: 13.88%
• 3Y*: 14.99%
• 5Y*: 6.91%
• 10Y*: 8.68%

NALFX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 19.18%
• 6M: 20.44%
• 1Y: 32.39%
• 3Y*: 10.98%
• 5Y*: 3.35%
• 10Y*: 10.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEGRX vs. NALFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BEGRX Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund	0.48%	25.64%	8.64%	15.40%	-11.70%	16.64%	4.07%	22.57%	-8.84%	12.30%
NALFX New Alternatives Fund	19.18%	28.13%	-6.03%	-2.49%	-15.87%	-4.78%	61.74%	36.98%	-6.91%	21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BEGRX and NALFX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1982	0.60

The correlation between BEGRX and NALFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BEGRX vs. NALFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEGRX

BEGRX Risk / Return Rank: 21
BEGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BEGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BEGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BEGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BEGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

NALFX

NALFX Risk / Return Rank: 64
NALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
NALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
NALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
NALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEGRX vs. NALFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund (BEGRX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BEGRX	NALFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.28	-0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	3.04	-0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.39	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	4.47	-2.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.72	13.35	-8.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BEGRX vs. NALFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the NALFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEGRX and NALFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEGRX	NALFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	2.28	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.19	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.61	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.43	-0.39

Drawdowns

BEGRX vs. NALFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEGRX drawdown since its inception was -73.56%, which is greater than NALFX's maximum drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGRX and NALFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEGRX	NALFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.56%	-59.67%	-13.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	-7.53%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.15%	-24.52%	+11.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.70%	-38.03%	+11.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.11%	-42.35%	+5.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.84%	-0.05%	-5.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.66%	-14.84%	-21.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	2.52%	+0.65%

Volatility

BEGRX vs. NALFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund (BEGRX) is 2.58%, while New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that BEGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NALFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEGRX	NALFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	5.44%	-2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.86%	11.93%	-4.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.88%	14.79%	-3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.38%	17.82%	-2.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.64%	18.03%	-1.39%

BEGRX vs. NALFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEGRX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than NALFX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEGRX vs. NALFX - Dividend Comparison

BEGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than NALFX's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BEGRX Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund	6.82%	6.86%	6.89%	6.23%	9.91%	6.83%	3.36%	2.62%	9.94%	3.43%	6.10%	8.90%
NALFX New Alternatives Fund	0.98%	1.17%	2.04%	4.47%	4.63%	5.14%	4.93%	5.55%	6.62%	4.16%	3.71%	1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEGRX and NALFX in my portfolio?

BEGRX and NALFX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BEGRX or NALFX?

NALFX has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to BEGRX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEGRX dropped -73.56% vs NALFX's -59.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NALFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.