BE vs. CLS
BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. BE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 5 years, BE returned 59.08%/yr vs 116.26%/yr for CLS. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BE vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 199.48% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 32.99% return.
BE
- 1D
- 4.56%
- 1M
- -10.19%
- YTD
- 199.48%
- 6M
- 173.97%
- 1Y
- 1,069.53%
- 3Y*
- 145.16%
- 5Y*
- 59.08%
- 10Y*
- —
CLS
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 28.26%
- 1Y
- 200.71%
- 3Y*
- 207.28%
- 5Y*
- 116.26%
- 10Y*
- 43.71%
BE vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 199.48% | 291.22% | 50.07% | -22.59% | -12.81% | -23.48% | 283.67% | -25.15% | -46.63% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 32.99% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -28.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BE and CLS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between BE and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BE:
$83.19B
CLS:
$45.48B
BE:
$0.02
CLS:
$8.28
BE:
11.33K
CLS:
47.45
BE:
27.91
CLS:
3.30
BE:
90.28
CLS:
21.68
BE:
$2.45B
CLS:
$13.81B
BE:
$761.91M
CLS:
$1.60B
BE:
$88.83M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BE vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
BE
CLS
BE vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BE | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.37 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.53 | 6.91 | +16.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.01 | 16.83 | +56.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BE vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BE | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.54% | -96.93% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.94% | -29.24% | -16.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.42% | -53.96% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.87% | -53.96% | -21.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.48% | -16.78% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -73.31% | +21.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.78% | 11.98% | +2.80% |
Volatility
BE vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Celestica Inc. (CLS) have volatilities of 27.74% and 27.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BE | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.74% | 27.54% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.65% | 55.42% | +20.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.62% | 72.65% | +34.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.95% | 57.70% | +28.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.68% | 49.97% | +45.71% |
Dividends
BE vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither BE nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BE vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BE vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
BE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
BE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
BE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BE and CLS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BE has higher volatility (27.74%) compared to CLS (27.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BE dropped -92.54% vs CLS's -96.93%.
BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.05 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BE and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer