PortfoliosLab logo
BE vs. PBW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BE and PBW is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BE vs. PBW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-33.88%
-24.92%
BE
PBW

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BE:

0.40

PBW:

-0.55

Sortino Ratio

BE:

1.43

PBW:

-0.60

Omega Ratio

BE:

1.17

PBW:

0.94

Calmar Ratio

BE:

0.51

PBW:

-0.26

Martin Ratio

BE:

1.48

PBW:

-1.16

Ulcer Index

BE:

27.07%

PBW:

19.70%

Daily Std Dev

BE:

99.14%

PBW:

41.34%

Max Drawdown

BE:

-92.54%

PBW:

-89.02%

Current Drawdown

BE:

-61.24%

PBW:

-86.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a -25.57% return, which is significantly lower than PBW's -17.89% return.


BE

YTD

-25.57%

1M

-4.12%

6M

50.68%

1Y

40.44%

5Y*

14.84%

10Y*

N/A

PBW

YTD

-17.89%

1M

15.70%

6M

-17.65%

1Y

-22.72%

5Y*

-11.19%

10Y*

-3.31%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BE vs. PBW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BE is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BE is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BE is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BE is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BE is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BE is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PBW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PBW is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PBW is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PBW is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PBW is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PBW is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PBW is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BE vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the PBW Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BE and PBW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.41
-0.55
BE
PBW

Dividends

BE vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison

BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
2.55%2.84%3.68%4.21%1.71%0.44%1.45%2.89%1.28%2.68%1.53%2.96%

Drawdowns

BE vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, roughly equal to the maximum PBW drawdown of -89.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and PBW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-61.24%
-86.56%
BE
PBW

Volatility

BE vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) have volatilities of 17.28% and 16.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
17.28%
16.99%
BE
PBW