PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDVL vs. NXTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDVL vs. NXTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly lower than NXTE's 36.11% return.


BDVL

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.91%
YTD
4.71%
6M
5.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NXTE

1D
-0.62%
1M
17.52%
YTD
36.11%
6M
34.91%
1Y
64.20%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDVL vs. NXTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BDVL and NXTE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.64

BDVL vs. NXTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BDVL
NXTE

Technology

23.0%
48.5%

Industrials

15.4%
17.6%

Financial Services

13.9%
1.5%

Healthcare

11.1%
11.3%

Communication Services

10.7%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
2.1%

Utilities

4.8%
2.2%

Energy

2.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%
0.5%

Real Estate

1.0%
10.9%

Technology

BDVL
23.0%
NXTE
48.5%

Industrials

BDVL
15.4%
NXTE
17.6%

Financial Services

BDVL
13.9%
NXTE
1.5%

Healthcare

BDVL
11.1%
NXTE
11.3%

Communication Services

BDVL
10.7%
NXTE
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BDVL
8.5%
NXTE
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

BDVL
6.3%
NXTE
2.1%

Utilities

BDVL
4.8%
NXTE
2.2%

Energy

BDVL
2.8%
NXTE

-

Basic Materials

BDVL
2.6%
NXTE
0.5%

Real Estate

BDVL
1.0%
NXTE
10.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDVL vs. NXTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDVL

NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDVL vs. NXTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDVL vs. NXTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDVLNXTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.67

+0.34

Drawdowns

BDVL vs. NXTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum NXTE drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and NXTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDVLNXTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-28.64%

+20.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.62%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-7.88%

+6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

Volatility

BDVL vs. NXTE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDVLNXTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.49%

24.53%

-15.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.49%

25.99%

-16.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.49%

25.99%

-16.50%

BDVL vs. NXTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTE's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDVL vs. NXTE - Dividend Comparison

BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than NXTE's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
2.66%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.37%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDVL and NXTE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.37% for NXTE.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 1.00% for NXTE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDVL and NXTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer