BDVL vs. FGD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD).
BDVL and FGD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDVL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2025. FGD is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index. It was launched on Nov 21, 2007. Both BDVL and FGD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BDVL vs. FGD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BDVL vs. FGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | -0.63% | 1.97% |
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.86% | 5.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than FGD's 5.86% return.
BDVL
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGD
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- 1Y
- 39.89%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BDVL vs. FGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FGD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BDVL vs. FGD — Risk / Return Rank
BDVL
FGD
BDVL vs. FGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDVL | FGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.25 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between BDVL and FGD is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BDVL vs. FGD - Dividend Comparison
BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than FGD's 5.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 2.81% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.34% | 5.62% | 5.87% | 6.44% | 5.74% | 5.35% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 5.88% | 4.01% | 4.36% | 5.07% |
Drawdowns
BDVL vs. FGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum FGD drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and FGD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDVL | FGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -68.05% | +60.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.45% | -6.66% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.17% | -12.67% | +11.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.73% | — |
Volatility
BDVL vs. FGD - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BDVL | FGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.29% | 15.05% | -5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.29% | 14.92% | -5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.29% | 18.29% | -9.00% |