BDVL vs. PID
BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds - BDVL tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index while PID tracks the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BDVL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.
Performance
BDVL vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than PID's 7.07% return.
BDVL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 5.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PID
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 1Y
- 15.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
BDVL vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 5.75% | 2.20% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 7.07% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDVL and PID is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.62 |
BDVL vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDVL
PID
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
BDVL
PID
Financial Services
BDVL
PID
Industrials
BDVL
PID
Healthcare
BDVL
PID
Communication Services
BDVL
PID
Consumer Cyclical
BDVL
PID
Consumer Defensive
BDVL
PID
Utilities
BDVL
PID
Energy
BDVL
PID
Basic Materials
BDVL
PID
Real Estate
BDVL
PID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDVL vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
BDVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PID
BDVL vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDVL | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDVL vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and PID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDVL | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -66.34% | +58.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.69% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -12.98% | +11.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.39% | — |
Volatility
BDVL vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDVL | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.48% | 9.77% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.48% | 13.94% | -4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.48% | 17.57% | -8.09% |
BDVL vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDVL vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than PID's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 3.52% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.48% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDVL and PID have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 3.48% for PID.
BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 0.56% for PID.
Find the right allocation for BDVL and PID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer