BDVL vs. SIMS
BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) and SIMS (SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF) are both Global Equities funds - BDVL tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index while SIMS tracks the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BDVL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SIMS.
Performance
BDVL vs. SIMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than SIMS's 9.29% return.
BDVL
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIMS
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 32.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- —
BDVL vs. SIMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 4.73% | 2.20% |
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF | 9.29% | 4.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDVL and SIMS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.63 |
BDVL vs. SIMS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDVL
SIMS
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
BDVL
SIMS
Financial Services
BDVL
SIMS
-
Industrials
BDVL
SIMS
Communication Services
BDVL
SIMS
Healthcare
BDVL
SIMS
-
Consumer Cyclical
BDVL
SIMS
Consumer Defensive
BDVL
SIMS
-
Utilities
BDVL
SIMS
Basic Materials
BDVL
SIMS
Energy
BDVL
SIMS
Real Estate
BDVL
SIMS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDVL vs. SIMS — Risk / Return Rank
BDVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIMS
BDVL vs. SIMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDVL | SIMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDVL vs. SIMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum SIMS drawdown of -43.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and SIMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDVL | SIMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -43.97% | +36.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -4.04% | +2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -16.00% | +14.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.09% | — |
Volatility
BDVL vs. SIMS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDVL | SIMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.71% | 24.05% | -14.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.71% | 25.26% | -15.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.71% | 26.05% | -16.34% |
BDVL vs. SIMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SIMS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDVL vs. SIMS - Dividend Comparison
BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than SIMS's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 3.56% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIMS SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF | 0.55% | 0.66% | 0.88% | 1.49% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.58% | 1.24% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDVL and SIMS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SIMS.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.55% for SIMS.
BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while SIMS tracks S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 0.45% for SIMS.
Find the right allocation for BDVL and SIMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer