BDVL vs. DGT
BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) and DGT (State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF) are both Global Equities funds - BDVL tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index while DGT tracks the The Global Dow. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BDVL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DGT.
Performance
BDVL vs. DGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly lower than DGT's 12.72% return.
BDVL
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 4.71%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 30.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
BDVL vs. DGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 4.71% | 1.97% |
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 12.72% | 5.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDVL and DGT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.87 |
BDVL vs. DGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BDVL
DGT
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
BDVL
DGT
Industrials
BDVL
DGT
Financial Services
BDVL
DGT
Healthcare
BDVL
DGT
Communication Services
BDVL
DGT
Consumer Cyclical
BDVL
DGT
Consumer Defensive
BDVL
DGT
Utilities
BDVL
DGT
Energy
BDVL
DGT
Basic Materials
BDVL
DGT
Real Estate
BDVL
DGT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDVL vs. DGT — Risk / Return Rank
BDVL
DGT
BDVL vs. DGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDVL | DGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.29 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
BDVL vs. DGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum DGT drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and DGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDVL | DGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -55.36% | +47.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -0.58% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -13.83% | +12.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.06% | — |
Volatility
BDVL vs. DGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDVL | DGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.49% | 11.98% | -2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.49% | 15.16% | -5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.49% | 16.95% | -7.46% |
BDVL vs. DGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DGT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDVL vs. DGT - Dividend Comparison
BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than DGT's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 2.66% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.83% | 2.53% | 3.15% | 2.66% | 1.97% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDVL and DGT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.52% for DGT.
BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while DGT tracks The Global Dow. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 0.50% for DGT.
Find the right allocation for BDVL and DGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer