PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDVL vs. DGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDVL vs. DGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than DGT's 10.92% return.


BDVL

1D
-0.97%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
4.73%
6M
4.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGT

1D
-1.17%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
10.92%
6M
10.57%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
21.71%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
14.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDVL vs. DGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BDVL and DGT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025

0.88

BDVL vs. DGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BDVL
DGT

Technology

27.8%
20.4%

Financial Services

14.3%
16.7%

Industrials

14.2%
13.5%

Communication Services

10.0%
5.9%

Healthcare

8.3%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
7.1%

Utilities

4.5%
3.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
7.2%

Energy

1.6%
6.3%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.4%

Technology

BDVL
27.8%
DGT
20.4%

Financial Services

BDVL
14.3%
DGT
16.7%

Industrials

BDVL
14.2%
DGT
13.5%

Communication Services

BDVL
10.0%
DGT
5.9%

Healthcare

BDVL
8.3%
DGT
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BDVL
6.9%
DGT
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

BDVL
5.3%
DGT
7.1%

Utilities

BDVL
4.5%
DGT
3.4%

Basic Materials

BDVL
1.9%
DGT
7.2%

Energy

BDVL
1.6%
DGT
6.3%

Real Estate

BDVL
0.9%
DGT
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDVL vs. DGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DGT
DGT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDVL vs. DGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BDVLDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.69

BDVL vs. DGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BDVL vs. DGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum DGT drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and DGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDVLDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-55.36%

+47.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-2.39%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-13.80%

+12.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

Volatility

BDVL vs. DGT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDVLDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

12.51%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.71%

15.23%

-5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.71%

16.84%

-7.13%

BDVL vs. DGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DGT's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDVL vs. DGT - Dividend Comparison

BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than DGT's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
3.56%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
2.53%2.78%2.83%2.53%3.15%2.66%1.97%2.76%2.50%1.93%2.31%2.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDVL and DGT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 2.53% for DGT.

BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index, while DGT tracks The Global Dow. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 0.50% for DGT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDVL and DGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer