BDC vs. VRT
BDC (Belden Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Electrical Equipment & Parts industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, BDC returned 15.79%/yr vs 67.37%/yr for VRT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BDC vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDC achieves a -5.07% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 104.63% return.
BDC
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -5.07%
- 6M
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 7.26%
- 5Y*
- 15.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
VRT
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 104.63%
- 6M
- 85.33%
- 1Y
- 195.39%
- 3Y*
- 156.10%
- 5Y*
- 67.37%
- 10Y*
- —
BDC vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDC Belden Inc. | -5.07% | 3.68% | 46.06% | 7.69% | 9.75% | 57.46% | -23.40% | 32.14% | -34.42% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 104.63% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDC and VRT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2018 | 0.37 |
The correlation between BDC and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BDC:
$4.36B
VRT:
$129.97B
BDC:
$5.94
VRT:
$3.99
BDC:
18.63
VRT:
83.15
BDC:
0.23
VRT:
0.36
BDC:
1.58
VRT:
11.95
BDC:
3.40
VRT:
30.62
BDC:
$2.79B
VRT:
$10.84B
BDC:
$1.04B
VRT:
$3.92B
BDC:
$427.27M
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDC vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
BDC
VRT
BDC vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Belden Inc. (BDC) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDC | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.47 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 7.94 | -7.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | 22.67 | -22.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDC | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 3.42 | -3.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 1.10 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 1.04 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
BDC vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDC drawdown since its inception was -85.69%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDC and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDC | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.69% | -71.24% | -14.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.41% | -24.78% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.62% | -61.28% | +24.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.62% | -71.24% | +34.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.68% | -11.90% | -14.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.82% | -16.22% | -18.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.99% | 8.66% | +5.33% |
Volatility
BDC vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Belden Inc. (BDC) is 10.31%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 16.92%. This indicates that BDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDC | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | 16.92% | -6.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.93% | 44.82% | -15.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.55% | 57.51% | -21.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.55% | 61.71% | -25.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.23% | 54.58% | -14.35% |
Dividends
BDC vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
BDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than VRT's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDC Belden Inc. | 0.18% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.26% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.36% | 0.48% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.42% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BDC vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Belden Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BDC vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
BDC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Belden Inc. reported a gross profit of 258.09M and revenue of 696.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
BDC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Belden Inc. reported an operating income of 77.96M and revenue of 696.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
BDC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Belden Inc. reported a net income of 51.03M and revenue of 696.38M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BDC and VRT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRT has higher volatility (16.92%) compared to BDC (10.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDC dropped -85.69% vs VRT's -71.24%.
VRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDC and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer