PortfoliosLab logo
BDC vs. ACLS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BDC and ACLS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BDC vs. ACLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Belden Inc. (BDC) and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BDC:

0.56

ACLS:

-0.82

Sortino Ratio

BDC:

1.06

ACLS:

-1.09

Omega Ratio

BDC:

1.14

ACLS:

0.87

Calmar Ratio

BDC:

0.62

ACLS:

-0.57

Martin Ratio

BDC:

1.67

ACLS:

-0.97

Ulcer Index

BDC:

12.59%

ACLS:

46.61%

Daily Std Dev

BDC:

36.88%

ACLS:

56.27%

Max Drawdown

BDC:

-85.69%

ACLS:

-99.34%

Current Drawdown

BDC:

-14.41%

ACLS:

-69.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BDC:

$4.44B

ACLS:

$2.01B

EPS

BDC:

$5.19

ACLS:

$5.36

PE Ratio

BDC:

21.66

ACLS:

11.49

PEG Ratio

BDC:

2.14

ACLS:

1.23

PS Ratio

BDC:

1.74

ACLS:

2.10

PB Ratio

BDC:

3.62

ACLS:

1.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDC:

$2.55B

ACLS:

$958.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDC:

$956.53M

ACLS:

$427.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

BDC:

$371.91M

ACLS:

$206.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDC achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly higher than ACLS's -11.86% return. Over the past 10 years, BDC has underperformed ACLS with an annualized return of 3.10%, while ACLS has yielded a comparatively higher 17.28% annualized return.


BDC

YTD

-0.15%

1M

20.11%

6M

-5.16%

1Y

20.59%

5Y*

32.67%

10Y*

3.10%

ACLS

YTD

-11.86%

1M

38.01%

6M

-15.90%

1Y

-45.78%

5Y*

21.28%

10Y*

17.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BDC vs. ACLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDC is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDC is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDC is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDC is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDC is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDC is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ACLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACLS is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACLS is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACLS is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACLS is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACLS is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACLS is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BDC vs. ACLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Belden Inc. (BDC) and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the ACLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDC and ACLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BDC vs. ACLS - Dividend Comparison

BDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while ACLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BDC
Belden Inc.
0.18%0.18%0.26%0.28%0.30%0.48%0.36%0.50%0.26%0.27%0.42%0.25%
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BDC vs. ACLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDC drawdown since its inception was -85.69%, smaller than the maximum ACLS drawdown of -99.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDC and ACLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BDC vs. ACLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Belden Inc. (BDC) is 8.83%, while Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) has a volatility of 13.68%. This indicates that BDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BDC vs. ACLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Belden Inc. and Axcelis Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20212022202320242025
624.86M
192.56M
(BDC) Total Revenue
(ACLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BDC vs. ACLS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Belden Inc. and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%20212022202320242025
39.3%
46.1%
(BDC) Gross Margin
(ACLS) Gross Margin
BDC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Belden Inc. reported a gross profit of 245.84M and revenue of 624.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.3%.

ACLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 88.77M and revenue of 192.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.1%.

BDC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Belden Inc. reported an operating income of 72.63M and revenue of 624.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

ACLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 29.16M and revenue of 192.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

BDC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Belden Inc. reported a net income of 51.94M and revenue of 624.86M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

ACLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Axcelis Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 28.58M and revenue of 192.56M, resulting in a net margin of 14.8%.