PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDC vs. APH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BDC vs. APH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Belden Inc. (BDC) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDC achieves a -5.07% return, which is significantly lower than APH's 9.45% return. Over the past 10 years, BDC has underperformed APH with an annualized return of 5.86%, while APH has yielded a comparatively higher 27.09% annualized return.


BDC

1D
1.07%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
-5.07%
6M
-7.84%
1Y
2.23%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
15.79%
10Y*
5.86%

APH

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.67%
YTD
9.45%
6M
6.89%
1Y
62.16%
3Y*
57.45%
5Y*
34.98%
10Y*
27.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDC vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BDC
Belden Inc.
-5.07%3.68%46.06%7.69%9.75%57.46%-23.40%32.14%-45.70%3.48%
APH
Amphenol Corporation
9.45%96.08%41.30%31.85%-11.96%35.25%22.09%34.91%-6.82%31.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BDC and APH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 1993

0.44

The correlation between BDC and APH shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BDC:

$4.36B

APH:

$190.39B

EPS

BDC:

$5.94

APH:

$4.58

PE Ratio

BDC:

18.63

APH:

32.20

PEG Ratio

BDC:

0.23

APH:

1.07

PS Ratio

BDC:

1.58

APH:

7.31

PB Ratio

BDC:

3.40

APH:

13.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDC:

$2.79B

APH:

$25.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDC:

$1.04B

APH:

$9.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

BDC:

$427.27M

APH:

$7.45B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDC vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDC
BDC Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDC Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

APH
APH Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
APH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
APH Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
APH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
APH Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDC vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Belden Inc. (BDC) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDCAPHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.06

1.55

-1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.34

1.98

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.28

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

2.22

-2.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.16

5.79

-5.63

BDC vs. APH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the APH Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDC and APH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDCAPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

1.55

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

1.16

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.98

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.63

-0.42

Drawdowns

BDC vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDC drawdown since its inception was -85.69%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDC and APH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDCAPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.69%

-63.41%

-22.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.41%

-28.19%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.62%

-28.19%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.62%

-28.73%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.69%

-37.56%

-30.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.68%

-11.03%

-15.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.82%

-13.56%

-21.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.99%

10.76%

+3.23%

Volatility

BDC vs. APH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Belden Inc. (BDC) is 10.31%, while Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a volatility of 15.91%. This indicates that BDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDCAPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

15.91%

-5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.93%

36.03%

-7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.55%

40.39%

-4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.55%

30.42%

+6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.23%

27.75%

+12.48%

Dividends

BDC vs. APH - Dividend Comparison

BDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than APH's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APH
Amphenol Corporation
0.56%0.55%0.79%1.07%1.06%0.89%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%
BDC
Belden Inc.
0.18%0.17%0.18%0.26%0.28%0.30%0.48%0.36%0.48%0.26%0.27%0.42%

Financials

BDC vs. APH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Belden Inc. and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
696.38M
7.62B
(BDC) Total Revenue
(APH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BDC vs. APH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Belden Inc. and Amphenol Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
37.1%
36.8%
Portfolio components
BDC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Belden Inc. reported a gross profit of 258.09M and revenue of 696.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

APH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

BDC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Belden Inc. reported an operating income of 77.96M and revenue of 696.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

APH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

BDC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Belden Inc. reported a net income of 51.03M and revenue of 696.38M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

APH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BDC and APH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APH has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to BDC (10.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDC dropped -85.69% vs APH's -63.41%.

APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDC and APH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer