BDC vs. APH
BDC (Belden Inc.) and APH (Amphenol Corporation) are both stocks. BDC operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while APH operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BDC returned 6.24%/yr vs 28.28%/yr for APH. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BDC vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDC achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than APH's 19.33% return. Over the past 10 years, BDC has underperformed APH with an annualized return of 6.24%, while APH has yielded a comparatively higher 28.28% annualized return.
BDC
- 1D
- 5.93%
- 1M
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 5.63%
- 3Y*
- 9.16%
- 5Y*
- 20.70%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.48%
APH
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 19.33%
- 1Y
- 55.11%
- 3Y*
- 54.89%
- 5Y*
- 35.99%
- 10Y*
- 28.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.19B | $1.10B | $1.42B | |
BDC Belden Inc. | $64.50M | $61.35M | $65.73M |
BDC vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDC Belden Inc. | 6.52% | 3.68% | 46.06% | 7.69% | 9.75% | 57.46% | -23.40% | 32.14% | -45.70% | 3.48% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 19.33% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 35.25% | 22.09% | 34.91% | -6.82% | 31.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDC and APH is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 1993 | 0.44 |
The correlation between BDC and APH shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BDC:
$4.83B
APH:
$197.70B
BDC:
$6.15
APH:
$4.00
BDC:
20.16
APH:
40.15
BDC:
0.25
APH:
1.34
BDC:
1.72
APH:
7.13
BDC:
3.52
APH:
13.38
BDC:
$2.86B
APH:
$29.01B
BDC:
$1.04B
APH:
$11.17B
BDC:
$437.81M
APH:
$9.37B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDC vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank
BDC
APH
BDC vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Belden Inc. (BDC) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDC | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.22 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 1.85 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.03 | 4.55 | -4.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDC vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDC drawdown since its inception was -85.69%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDC and APH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDC | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.69% | -63.41% | -22.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.00% | -28.19% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.75% | -28.19% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.62% | -28.73% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.69% | -37.56% | -30.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.73% | -8.86% | -8.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -13.54% | -21.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.54% | 11.44% | +6.10% |
Volatility
BDC vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
Belden Inc. (BDC) has a higher volatility of 18.94% compared to Amphenol Corporation (APH) at 13.69%. This indicates that BDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDC | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.94% | 13.69% | +5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.12% | 35.63% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.56% | 44.23% | -3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.61% | 31.52% | +6.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.37% | 28.33% | +12.04% |
Dividends
BDC vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
BDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than APH's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.57% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
BDC Belden Inc. | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.26% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.36% | 0.48% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.42% |
Financials
BDC vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Belden Inc. and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BDC vs. APH - Profitability Comparison
BDC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Belden Inc. reported a gross profit of 293.62M and revenue of 750.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.55B and revenue of 8.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.
BDC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Belden Inc. reported an operating income of 99.26M and revenue of 750.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.2%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 2.58B and revenue of 8.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.5%.
BDC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Belden Inc. reported a net income of 68.54M and revenue of 750.16M, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 1.77B and revenue of 8.76B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BDC and APH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDC has higher volatility (18.94%) compared to APH (13.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDC dropped -85.69% vs APH's -63.41%.
APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDC and APH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer