BDC vs. BMI
Compare and contrast key facts about Belden Inc. (BDC) and Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BDC or BMI.
Key characteristics
| BDC | BMI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.28% | 22.65% |
| 1Y Return | 12.64% | 38.52% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 27.41% | 27.82% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.89% | 28.96% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.53% | 24.08% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.27 | 1.34 |
| Daily Std Dev | 41.61% | 30.12% |
| Max Drawdown | -85.69% | -68.22% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.74% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| BDC | BMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.59B | $5.56B |
| EPS | $5.11 | $3.48 |
| PE Ratio | 17.27 | 54.31 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.14 | 2.29 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.41B | $740.77M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $926.35M | $219.97M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $389.17M | $158.64M |
Correlation
The correlation between BDC and BMI is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BDC vs. BMI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BDC achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly lower than BMI's 22.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BDC has underperformed BMI with an annualized return of 2.53%, while BMI has yielded a comparatively higher 24.08% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BDC vs. BMI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Belden Inc. (BDC) and Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BDC vs. BMI - Dividend Comparison
BDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than BMI's 0.55% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDC Belden Inc. | 0.23% | 0.26% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.36% | 0.50% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.28% |
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | 0.55% | 0.64% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.33% | 1.25% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
BDC vs. BMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDC drawdown since its inception was -85.69%, which is greater than BMI's maximum drawdown of -68.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDC and BMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BDC vs. BMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Belden Inc. (BDC) is 11.46%, while Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that BDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BDC vs. BMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Belden Inc. and Badger Meter, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities