PortfoliosLab logo
BDC vs. SU.PA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BDC and SU.PA is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BDC vs. SU.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Belden Inc. (BDC) and Schneider Electric S.E. (SU.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BDC:

0.45

SU.PA:

-0.15

Sortino Ratio

BDC:

0.96

SU.PA:

-0.05

Omega Ratio

BDC:

1.12

SU.PA:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

BDC:

0.54

SU.PA:

-0.21

Martin Ratio

BDC:

1.46

SU.PA:

-0.63

Ulcer Index

BDC:

12.43%

SU.PA:

10.61%

Daily Std Dev

BDC:

36.54%

SU.PA:

33.26%

Max Drawdown

BDC:

-85.69%

SU.PA:

-74.24%

Current Drawdown

BDC:

-18.83%

SU.PA:

-20.94%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BDC:

$4.21B

SU.PA:

€120.41B

EPS

BDC:

$5.17

SU.PA:

€7.89

PE Ratio

BDC:

20.62

SU.PA:

27.22

PEG Ratio

BDC:

2.14

SU.PA:

1.80

PS Ratio

BDC:

1.65

SU.PA:

3.16

PB Ratio

BDC:

3.39

SU.PA:

3.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

BDC:

$2.55B

SU.PA:

€38.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BDC:

$956.53M

SU.PA:

€16.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

BDC:

$371.91M

SU.PA:

€7.39B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDC achieves a -5.31% return, which is significantly higher than SU.PA's -10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, BDC has underperformed SU.PA with an annualized return of 2.76%, while SU.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.61% annualized return.


BDC

YTD

-5.31%

1M

15.43%

6M

-15.75%

1Y

15.44%

5Y*

27.15%

10Y*

2.76%

SU.PA

YTD

-10.83%

1M

9.19%

6M

-10.78%

1Y

-6.83%

5Y*

23.21%

10Y*

14.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BDC vs. SU.PA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDC is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDC is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDC is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDC is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDC is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDC is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SU.PA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SU.PA is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SU.PA is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SU.PA is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SU.PA is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SU.PA is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SU.PA is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BDC vs. SU.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Belden Inc. (BDC) and Schneider Electric S.E. (SU.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the SU.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDC and SU.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BDC vs. SU.PA - Dividend Comparison

BDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than SU.PA's 1.63% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BDC
Belden Inc.
0.19%0.18%0.26%0.28%0.30%0.48%0.36%0.50%0.26%0.27%0.42%0.25%
SU.PA
Schneider Electric S.E.
1.63%1.45%1.73%2.22%1.51%2.16%2.57%3.68%2.88%3.03%3.65%3.09%

Drawdowns

BDC vs. SU.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDC drawdown since its inception was -85.69%, which is greater than SU.PA's maximum drawdown of -74.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDC and SU.PA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BDC vs. SU.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Belden Inc. (BDC) is 10.31%, while Schneider Electric S.E. (SU.PA) has a volatility of 13.24%. This indicates that BDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SU.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BDC vs. SU.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Belden Inc. and Schneider Electric S.E.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
624.86M
19.98B
(BDC) Total Revenue
(SU.PA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BDC values in USD, SU.PA values in EUR

BDC vs. SU.PA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Belden Inc. and Schneider Electric S.E. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%42.0%44.0%20212022202320242025
39.3%
41.9%
(BDC) Gross Margin
(SU.PA) Gross Margin
BDC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Belden Inc. reported a gross profit of 245.84M and revenue of 624.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.3%.

SU.PA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Schneider Electric S.E. reported a gross profit of 8.38B and revenue of 19.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.9%.

BDC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Belden Inc. reported an operating income of 72.63M and revenue of 624.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

SU.PA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Schneider Electric S.E. reported an operating income of 3.44B and revenue of 19.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.

BDC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Belden Inc. reported a net income of 51.94M and revenue of 624.86M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

SU.PA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Schneider Electric S.E. reported a net income of 2.39B and revenue of 19.98B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.