BCTK vs. NXTG
BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and NXTG (First Trust IndXX NextG ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. BCTK is actively managed, while NXTG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCTK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NXTG.
Performance
BCTK vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly lower than NXTG's 43.67% return.
BCTK
- 1D
- -4.03%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 20.77%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXTG
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 43.67%
- 6M
- 43.68%
- 1Y
- 65.86%
- 3Y*
- 32.64%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 17.41%
BCTK vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 20.77% | 0.84% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 43.67% | 1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCTK and NXTG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCTK vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank
BCTK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NXTG
BCTK vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCTK | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.54 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 21.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCTK vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -13.96%, smaller than the maximum NXTG drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and NXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCTK | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -33.61% | +19.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -7.80% | +1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -7.91% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
BCTK vs. NXTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCTK | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 21.37% | +8.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 18.57% | +11.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 19.11% | +11.02% |
BCTK vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCTK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCTK vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison
BCTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 1.19% | 1.56% | 1.51% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 1.97% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 1.27% | 1.65% | 1.23% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCTK and NXTG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NXTG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NXTG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCTK.
NXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for BCTK.
They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCTK and 0.70% for NXTG.
Find the right allocation for BCTK and NXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer