BCTK vs. GSG
BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - BCTK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. BCTK is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
BCTK vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 26.06% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 40.46% return.
BCTK
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 13.13%
- YTD
- 26.06%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 40.46%
- 6M
- 38.18%
- 1Y
- 49.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.42%
BCTK vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 26.06% | 1.80% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 40.46% | 1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCTK and GSG is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCTK vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
BCTK
GSG
BCTK vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCTK | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.65 | -0.09 | +2.74 |
Drawdowns
BCTK vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -13.96%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCTK | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -89.62% | +75.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -57.59% | +55.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -63.71% | +60.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.62% | — |
Volatility
BCTK vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCTK | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.93% | 23.01% | +3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 22.61% | +4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 22.03% | +4.90% |
BCTK vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BCTK and GSG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
BCTK vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCTK nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCTK and GSG have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCTK and GSG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
BCTK and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BCTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and iShares.
Find the right allocation for BCTK and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer