GSG vs. COMT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT).
GSG and COMT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 2006. COMT is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Oct 15, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSG or COMT.
Correlation
The correlation between GSG and COMT is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSG vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSG:
0.92
COMT:
0.83
GSG:
1.38
COMT:
1.25
GSG:
1.16
COMT:
1.15
GSG:
0.19
COMT:
0.45
GSG:
2.64
COMT:
2.51
GSG:
5.44%
COMT:
4.76%
GSG:
15.60%
COMT:
14.38%
GSG:
-89.62%
COMT:
-51.89%
GSG:
-69.46%
COMT:
-16.52%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSG achieves a 5.88% return, which is significantly higher than COMT's 5.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GSG has underperformed COMT with an annualized return of 1.90%, while COMT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.67% annualized return.
GSG
5.88%
8.78%
7.16%
13.16%
7.97%
1.90%
COMT
5.41%
7.75%
5.11%
11.20%
6.96%
3.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSG vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSG vs. COMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GSG
COMT
GSG vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSG vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 4.65% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
GSG vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and COMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSG vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) at 3.92%. This indicates that GSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.