BCTK vs. EMLP
BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BCTK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while EMLP is a MLPs fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. BCTK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for EMLP.
Performance
BCTK vs. EMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly higher than EMLP's 16.16% return.
BCTK
- 1D
- -4.03%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 20.77%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMLP
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 16.10%
- 1Y
- 20.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 15.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
BCTK vs. EMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 20.77% | 0.84% |
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.16% | -0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCTK and EMLP is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCTK vs. EMLP — Risk / Return Rank
BCTK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMLP
BCTK vs. EMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCTK | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCTK vs. EMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -13.96%, smaller than the maximum EMLP drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and EMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCTK | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -43.61% | +29.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -2.33% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -5.75% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.69% | — |
Volatility
BCTK vs. EMLP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCTK | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 9.97% | +20.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 14.49% | +15.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 17.69% | +12.44% |
BCTK vs. EMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCTK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLP's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCTK vs. EMLP - Dividend Comparison
BCTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.75% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCTK and EMLP have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCTK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCTK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.
EMLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 0.00% for BCTK.
BCTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while EMLP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCTK and 0.96% for EMLP.
Find the right allocation for BCTK and EMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer