BCTK vs. CAOS

Last updated Jun 18, 2026

BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCTK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. BCTK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

BCTK vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 24.17% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.64% return.

BCTK

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 8.38%
• YTD: 24.17%
• 6M: 29.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 1.59%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCTK vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	24.17%	0.84%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.64%	-0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BCTK and CAOS is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025	-0.33

Return for Risk

BCTK vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCTK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 36
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCTK vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCTK	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.06	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.69	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.10	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.06	—

Drawdowns

BCTK vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -13.96%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCTK	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.96%	-3.89%	-10.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.32%	-1.25%	-2.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.19%	-0.92%	-2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCTK	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.30%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.66%	1.50%	+28.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.66%	4.24%	+25.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.66%	4.24%	+25.42%

BCTK vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCTK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCTK vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCTK nor CAOS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCTK and CAOS in my portfolio?

BCTK and CAOS have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCTK or CAOS?

On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCTK or CAOS?

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCTK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCTK or CAOS?

BCTK and CAOS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BCTK and CAOS?

BCTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCTK and 0.63% for CAOS.