PortfoliosLab logo
CAOS vs. TAIL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CAOS and TAIL is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CAOS vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CAOS:

0.95

TAIL:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

CAOS:

1.35

TAIL:

0.71

Omega Ratio

CAOS:

1.35

TAIL:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

CAOS:

1.39

TAIL:

0.14

Martin Ratio

CAOS:

3.87

TAIL:

0.73

Ulcer Index

CAOS:

1.29%

TAIL:

9.93%

Daily Std Dev

CAOS:

5.34%

TAIL:

20.76%

Max Drawdown

CAOS:

-3.60%

TAIL:

-52.37%

Current Drawdown

CAOS:

-3.13%

TAIL:

-46.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAOS achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than TAIL's 9.25% return.


CAOS

YTD

1.25%

1M

0.07%

6M

1.70%

1Y

5.06%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

TAIL

YTD

9.25%

1M

-4.46%

6M

8.69%

1Y

7.39%

3Y*

-7.65%

5Y*

-9.78%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF

Cambria Tail Risk ETF

CAOS vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAOS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAOS vs. TAIL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAOS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAOS is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAOS is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAOS is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAOS is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAOS is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAOS is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TAIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TAIL is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TAIL is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TAIL is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TAIL is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TAIL is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TAIL is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CAOS vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CAOS Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the TAIL Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAOS and TAIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CAOS vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison

CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
2.64%3.47%3.73%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%

Drawdowns

CAOS vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAOS drawdown since its inception was -3.60%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAOS and TAIL.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CAOS vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) is 0.58%, while Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that CAOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...