BCFN vs. BCSM
BCFN (Baron Financials ETF) and BCSM (Baron SMID Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while BCSM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital. BCFN is passively managed, while BCSM is actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCFN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCSM.
Performance
BCFN vs. BCSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFN achieves a -17.02% return, which is significantly lower than BCSM's 0.41% return.
BCFN
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- YTD
- -17.02%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCSM
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 6.09%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCFN vs. BCSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCFN Baron Financials ETF | -17.02% | 0.35% |
BCSM Baron SMID Cap ETF | 0.41% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFN and BCSM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFN vs. BCSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFN | BCSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.70 | -0.01 | -1.69 |
Drawdowns
BCFN vs. BCSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFN drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than BCSM's maximum drawdown of -17.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFN and BCSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFN | BCSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.95% | -17.45% | -3.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.09% | -4.06% | -15.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -7.36% | -4.81% |
Volatility
BCFN vs. BCSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFN | BCSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.41% | 20.15% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 20.15% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 20.15% | -0.74% |
BCFN vs. BCSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BCSM's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFN vs. BCSM - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCFN nor BCSM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFN and BCSM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCSM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCSM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.
BCFN and BCSM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BCFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while BCSM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCFN and 0.75% for BCSM.
Find the right allocation for BCFN and BCSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer