PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCFN vs. BCSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCFN vs. BCSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCFN achieves a -17.02% return, which is significantly lower than BCSM's 0.41% return.


BCFN

1D
-2.00%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
-17.02%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCSM

1D
-1.38%
1M
6.09%
YTD
0.41%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFN vs. BCSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BCFN
Baron Financials ETF
-17.02%0.35%
BCSM
Baron SMID Cap ETF
0.41%-0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BCFN and BCSM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCFN vs. BCSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCFN vs. BCSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCFNBCSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.70

-0.01

-1.69

Drawdowns

BCFN vs. BCSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFN drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than BCSM's maximum drawdown of -17.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFN and BCSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCFNBCSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-17.45%

-3.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.09%

-4.06%

-15.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-7.36%

-4.81%

Volatility

BCFN vs. BCSM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCFNBCSMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

20.15%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

20.15%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

20.15%

-0.74%

BCFN vs. BCSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BCSM's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCFN vs. BCSM - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCFN nor BCSM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BCFN and BCSM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCSM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCSM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.

BCFN and BCSM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BCFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while BCSM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCFN and 0.75% for BCSM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCFN and BCSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer