PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCFN vs. FTXO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCFN vs. FTXO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCFN achieves a -17.02% return, which is significantly lower than FTXO's 0.81% return.


BCFN

1D
-2.00%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
-17.02%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTXO

1D
-1.34%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
0.81%
6M
4.64%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
24.18%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFN vs. FTXO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BCFN
Baron Financials ETF
-17.02%0.35%
FTXO
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF
0.81%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BCFN and FTXO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCFN vs. FTXO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCFN

FTXO
FTXO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FTXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCFN vs. FTXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCFN vs. FTXO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCFNFTXODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.70

0.31

-2.01

Drawdowns

BCFN vs. FTXO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFN drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum FTXO drawdown of -55.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFN and FTXO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCFNFTXODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-55.26%

+34.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.09%

-8.10%

-10.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-15.88%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

Volatility

BCFN vs. FTXO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCFNFTXODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

20.80%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

27.01%

-7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

29.98%

-10.57%

BCFN vs. FTXO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCFN vs. FTXO - Dividend Comparison

BCFN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BCFN
Baron Financials ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTXO
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF
1.78%1.92%2.18%3.20%2.94%1.64%2.74%2.53%3.51%1.09%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCFN and FTXO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTXO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTXO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.

FTXO has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.00% for BCFN.

BCFN tracks Actively Managed, while FTXO tracks NASDAQ US Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCFN and 0.60% for FTXO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCFN and FTXO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer