BCSM vs. BCTK

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BCSM (Baron SMID Cap ETF) and BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCSM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while BCTK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

BCSM vs. BCTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM) and Baron Technology ETF (BCTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCSM achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than BCTK's 20.79% return.

BCSM

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: -1.22%
• 6M: -3.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCTK

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.95%
• YTD: 20.79%
• 6M: 18.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCSM vs. BCTK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCSM Baron SMID Cap ETF	-1.22%	-2.70%
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	20.79%	0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BCSM and BCTK is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

BCSM vs. BCTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM) and Baron Technology ETF (BCTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

BCSM vs. BCTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCSM drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, which is greater than BCTK's maximum drawdown of -13.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSM and BCTK.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCSM	BCTK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.45%	-13.96%	-3.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.61%	-5.95%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.21%	-3.20%	-4.01%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCSM	BCTK	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.43%	30.02%	-9.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.43%	30.02%	-9.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.43%	30.02%	-9.59%

BCSM vs. BCTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCSM and BCTK have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

BCSM vs. BCTK - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCSM nor BCTK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCSM and BCTK in my portfolio?

BCSM and BCTK have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCSM or BCTK?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCSM or BCTK?

BCSM and BCTK have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCSM or BCTK?

BCSM and BCTK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BCSM and BCTK?

BCSM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BCTK is Technology Equities.