BCSM vs. BCFN
BCSM (Baron SMID Cap ETF) and BCFN (Baron Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCSM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while BCFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed. BCSM is actively managed, while BCFN is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCSM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BCFN.
Performance
BCSM vs. BCFN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCSM achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than BCFN's -17.02% return.
BCSM
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 6.09%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCFN
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- YTD
- -17.02%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCSM vs. BCFN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCSM Baron SMID Cap ETF | 0.41% | -0.51% |
BCFN Baron Financials ETF | -17.02% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCSM and BCFN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCSM vs. BCFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron SMID Cap ETF (BCSM) and Baron Financials ETF (BCFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCSM | BCFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | -1.70 | +1.69 |
Drawdowns
BCSM vs. BCFN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCSM drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, smaller than the maximum BCFN drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCSM and BCFN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCSM | BCFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.45% | -20.95% | +3.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.06% | -19.09% | +15.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -12.17% | +4.81% |
Volatility
BCSM vs. BCFN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCSM | BCFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 19.41% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 19.41% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 19.41% | +0.74% |
BCSM vs. BCFN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCSM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BCFN's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCSM vs. BCFN - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCSM nor BCFN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCSM and BCFN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCSM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCSM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.
BCSM and BCFN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BCSM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BCFN is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCSM and 0.80% for BCFN.
Find the right allocation for BCSM and BCFN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer