BCS vs. APH
BCS (Barclays PLC) and APH (Amphenol Corporation) are both stocks. BCS operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while APH operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BCS returned 14.35%/yr vs 27.74%/yr for APH. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BCS vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly lower than APH's 14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BCS has underperformed APH with an annualized return of 14.35%, while APH has yielded a comparatively higher 27.74% annualized return.
BCS
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- 13.05%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 49.51%
- 3Y*
- 52.43%
- 5Y*
- 24.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
APH
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 23.04%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 19.47%
- 1Y
- 67.47%
- 3Y*
- 57.45%
- 5Y*
- 36.37%
- 10Y*
- 27.74%
BCS vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCS Barclays PLC | 1.28% | 96.49% | 76.26% | 6.01% | -21.90% | 31.71% | -12.84% | 31.90% | -29.25% | 0.44% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 14.03% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 35.25% | 22.09% | 34.91% | -6.82% | 31.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCS and APH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 1991 | 0.33 |
Fundamentals
BCS:
$87.41B
APH:
$198.36B
BCS:
£2.06
APH:
$4.58
BCS:
9.23
APH:
33.54
BCS:
1.67
APH:
1.12
BCS:
2.32
APH:
7.62
BCS:
0.85
APH:
14.19
BCS:
£28.57B
APH:
$25.90B
BCS:
£26.96B
APH:
$9.67B
BCS:
£9.15B
APH:
$7.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCS vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank
BCS
APH
BCS vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCS | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.27 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 5.85 | -0.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCS vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than APH's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and APH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCS | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.36% | -63.41% | -30.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.20% | -28.19% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.20% | -28.19% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.14% | -28.73% | -19.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.10% | -37.56% | -28.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.68% | -7.31% | -17.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.42% | -13.56% | -24.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.23% | 10.92% | -1.69% |
Volatility
BCS vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays PLC (BCS) is 10.56%, while Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a volatility of 15.50%. This indicates that BCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCS | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.56% | 15.50% | -4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.06% | 37.39% | -13.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.37% | 41.68% | -12.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.06% | 30.75% | +3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 27.93% | +9.78% |
Dividends
BCS vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than APH's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.54% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
BCS Barclays PLC | 1.83% | 1.70% | 3.13% | 4.86% | 4.18% | 1.61% | 3.91% | 3.68% | 3.21% | 1.37% | 2.26% | 2.95% |
Financials
BCS vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barclays PLC and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCS vs. APH - Profitability Comparison
BCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a gross profit of 8.16B and revenue of 8.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
BCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported an operating income of 2.81B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
BCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCS and APH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APH has higher volatility (15.50%) compared to BCS (10.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCS dropped -94.36% vs APH's -63.41%.
BCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCS and APH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer