BCHP vs. SPYG
BCHP (Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. BCHP is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past year, BCHP returned 6.63% vs 33.66% for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCHP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
BCHP vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCHP achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.73% return.
BCHP
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 6M
- 13.08%
- 1Y
- 33.66%
- 3Y*
- 28.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.16%
BCHP vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF | 0.53% | 10.20% | 20.55% | 12.89% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.73% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCHP and SPYG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between BCHP and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
BCHP vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BCHP
SPYG
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
BCHP
SPYG
Financial Services
BCHP
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
BCHP
SPYG
Communication Services
BCHP
SPYG
Industrials
BCHP
SPYG
Healthcare
BCHP
SPYG
Real Estate
BCHP
SPYG
Basic Materials
BCHP
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
BCHP
-
SPYG
Energy
BCHP
-
SPYG
Utilities
BCHP
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCHP vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
BCHP
SPYG
BCHP vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCHP | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.37 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 2.46 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 10.17 | -8.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCHP | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 2.11 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.35 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
BCHP vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCHP drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHP and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCHP | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.56% | -67.63% | +49.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.12% | -13.76% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -1.15% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.97% | -24.32% | +21.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 3.32% | +2.32% |
Volatility
BCHP vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCHP | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 4.34% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 12.46% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.93% | 16.06% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 21.16% | -4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 20.64% | -3.78% |
BCHP vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCHP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCHP vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.02% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCHP and SPYG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCHP has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to SPYG (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHP dropped -18.56% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 1-year performance, SPYG leads with 33.66% vs 6.63% for BCHP. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 33.66% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BCHP.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for BCHP.
BCHP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Principal and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BCHP and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCHP and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer