BCHP vs. PFM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BCHP (Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BCHP is actively managed, while PFM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BCHP returned 14.24%/yr vs 15.40%/yr for PFM. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCHP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.

Performance

BCHP vs. PFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHP achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than PFM's 9.94% return.

BCHP

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 0.86%
• 6M: -0.52%
• YTD: -0.35%
• 1Y: 1.46%
• 3Y*: 14.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PFM

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 1.34%
• 6M: 7.14%
• YTD: 9.94%
• 1Y: 17.83%
• 3Y*: 15.40%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 11.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCHP vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF	-0.35%	10.20%	20.55%	13.14%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	9.94%	14.00%	16.87%	5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHP and PFM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.67

The correlation between BCHP and PFM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

BCHP vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BCHP	PFM
Technology	31.5%	27.6%
Financial Services	23.9%	17.9%
Communication Services	18.4%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.1%	3.7%
Industrials	9.3%	10.7%
Healthcare	3.9%	15.1%
Real Estate	1.2%	2.0%
Basic Materials	-	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	11.1%
Energy	-	4.3%
Utilities	-	3.9%

Return for Risk

BCHP vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHP

BCHP Risk / Return Rank: 10
BCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 11

PFM

PFM Risk / Return Rank: 73
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHP vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCHP	PFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	1.91	-1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.23	2.80	-2.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.35	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	2.52	-2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.25	10.24	-10.00

BCHP vs. PFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHP Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the PFM Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHP and PFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCHP vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHP drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHP and PFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCHP	PFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.56%	-53.21%	+34.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.12%	-7.09%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.56%	-14.50%	-4.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.19%	0.00%	-3.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.05%	-6.91%	+3.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.91%	1.74%	+4.17%

Volatility

BCHP vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison

Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.07%. This indicates that BCHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCHP	PFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	2.07%	+2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.81%	7.14%	+6.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.68%	9.39%	+7.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	13.50%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.92%	15.18%	+1.74%

BCHP vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCHP vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison

BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.02%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.32%	1.41%	1.58%	1.86%	1.95%	1.69%	1.92%	1.94%	2.27%	1.70%	2.56%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCHP and PFM in my portfolio?

BCHP and PFM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCHP or PFM?

BCHP has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to PFM (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHP dropped -18.56% vs PFM's -53.21%.

Which ETF is better, BCHP or PFM?

On 3-year performance, PFM leads with 15.40% vs 14.24% for BCHP. On fees, PFM is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCHP or PFM?

Over the 3-year period, PFM has performed better with a 15.40% return vs 14.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCHP or PFM?

PFM is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BCHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCHP or PFM?

PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for BCHP.

What is the main difference between BCHP and PFM?

They also come from different issuers: Principal and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BCHP and 0.53% for PFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.