BCGIX vs. CIBR

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

BCGIX (BrandywineGLOBAL Corporate Credit Fund Class I) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both funds - BCGIX is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Corporate & High Yield Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BCGIX returned 7.46%/yr vs 26.90%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

BCGIX vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL Corporate Credit Fund Class I (BCGIX) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCGIX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.93% return.

BCGIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.40%
• 6M: 0.61%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 1Y: 4.00%
• 3Y*: 7.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIBR

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: 7.77%
• 6M: 26.97%
• YTD: 28.93%
• 1Y: 27.27%
• 3Y*: 26.90%
• 5Y*: 14.19%
• 10Y*: 18.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGIX vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BCGIX BrandywineGLOBAL Corporate Credit Fund Class I	0.61%	5.51%	9.19%	11.72%	-9.32%	1.21%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.93%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	7.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BCGIX and CIBR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021	0.38

Return for Risk

BCGIX vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCGIX

BCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 42
BCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
BCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 30
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCGIX vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL Corporate Credit Fund Class I (BCGIX) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCGIX	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	1.00	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	1.50	+0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.19	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	1.16	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.68	2.68	+4.00

BCGIX vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCGIX and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCGIX vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGIX drawdown since its inception was -13.16%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGIX and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCGIX	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.16%	-33.89%	+20.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.49%	-21.99%	+19.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.71%	-21.99%	+18.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-2.52%	+2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-8.65%	+5.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.57%	9.47%	-8.90%

Volatility

BCGIX vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL Corporate Credit Fund Class I (BCGIX) is 0.62%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that BCGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCGIX	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	7.55%	-6.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.21%	22.23%	-20.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86%	25.79%	-22.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.04%	25.20%	-21.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.04%	23.58%	-19.54%

BCGIX vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCGIX and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

BCGIX vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

BCGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than CIBR's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BCGIX BrandywineGLOBAL Corporate Credit Fund Class I	5.81%	6.50%	7.11%	4.87%	5.21%	4.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.43%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCGIX and CIBR in my portfolio?

BCGIX and CIBR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCGIX or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to BCGIX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCGIX dropped -13.16% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.