PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCGIX vs. FHYSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCGIX vs. FHYSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL Corporate Credit Fund Class I (BCGIX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCGIX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than FHYSX's 1.19% return.


BCGIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.84%
1Y
4.41%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
10Y*

FHYSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.71%
YTD
1.19%
6M
1.89%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
5.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGIX vs. FHYSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BCGIX
BrandywineGLOBAL Corporate Credit Fund Class I
0.20%5.51%9.19%11.72%-9.32%1.21%
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
1.19%9.14%6.42%12.77%-13.16%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BCGIX and FHYSX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2021

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between BCGIX and FHYSX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCGIX vs. FHYSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCGIX
BCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FHYSX
FHYSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FHYSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCGIX vs. FHYSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL Corporate Credit Fund Class I (BCGIX) and Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCGIXFHYSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.47

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.74

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

14.14

-6.40

BCGIX vs. FHYSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the FHYSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCGIX and FHYSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCGIX vs. FHYSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGIX drawdown since its inception was -13.16%, smaller than the maximum FHYSX drawdown of -21.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGIX and FHYSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCGIXFHYSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.16%

-21.45%

+8.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-2.44%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.71%

-3.64%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.34%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-2.58%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.47%

+0.10%

Volatility

BCGIX vs. FHYSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL Corporate Credit Fund Class I (BCGIX) is 0.72%, while Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) has a volatility of 0.91%. This indicates that BCGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHYSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCGIXFHYSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

0.91%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.25%

2.66%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

3.44%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.06%

5.25%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.06%

5.76%

-1.70%

BCGIX vs. FHYSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGIX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FHYSX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCGIX vs. FHYSX - Dividend Comparison

BCGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, less than FHYSX's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCGIX
BrandywineGLOBAL Corporate Credit Fund Class I
5.83%6.50%7.11%4.87%5.21%4.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FHYSX
Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio
6.30%6.28%5.84%5.30%5.27%4.54%5.74%6.18%6.61%6.98%6.45%8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCGIX and FHYSX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHYSX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to BCGIX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCGIX dropped -13.16% vs FHYSX's -21.45%.

FHYSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCGIX and FHYSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer