BCFN vs. BCTK
BCFN (Baron Financials ETF) and BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while BCTK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital. BCFN is passively managed, while BCTK is actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCFN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCTK.
Performance
BCFN vs. BCTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFN achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than BCTK's 25.84% return.
BCFN
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- -14.51%
- 6M
- -15.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCTK
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 6.21%
- YTD
- 25.84%
- 6M
- 23.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCFN vs. BCTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCFN Baron Financials ETF | -14.51% | -0.45% |
BCTK Baron Technology ETF | 25.84% | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFN and BCTK is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFN vs. BCTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and Baron Technology ETF (BCTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCFN vs. BCTK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFN drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, which is greater than BCTK's maximum drawdown of -13.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFN and BCTK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFN | BCTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.95% | -13.96% | -6.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.64% | -2.02% | -14.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.57% | -3.16% | -9.41% |
Volatility
BCFN vs. BCTK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFN | BCTK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.05% | 29.67% | -10.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 29.67% | -10.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 29.67% | -10.62% |
BCFN vs. BCTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BCTK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCFN vs. BCTK - Dividend Comparison
Neither BCFN nor BCTK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFN and BCTK have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCTK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCTK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.
BCFN and BCTK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BCFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while BCTK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCFN and 0.75% for BCTK.
Find the right allocation for BCFN and BCTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer