BCC vs. SSD
BCC (Boise Cascade Company) and SSD (Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.) are both stocks. BCC operates in Lumber & Wood Production (Basic Materials), while SSD operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, BCC returned 17.60%/yr vs 19.29%/yr for SSD. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BCC vs. SSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCC achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than SSD's 23.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BCC has underperformed SSD with an annualized return of 17.60%, while SSD has yielded a comparatively higher 19.29% annualized return.
BCC
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- -1.70%
- 1Y
- -15.13%
- 3Y*
- 0.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 17.60%
SSD
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 23.23%
- 6M
- 18.84%
- 1Y
- 29.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 19.29%
BCC vs. SSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | -0.86% | -37.47% | -4.02% | 106.65% | 1.53% | 62.14% | 37.01% | 59.08% | -38.36% | 77.67% |
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 23.23% | -1.95% | -15.74% | 125.36% | -35.62% | 50.20% | 17.51% | 50.84% | -4.39% | 33.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCC and SSD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2013 | 0.58 |
The correlation between BCC and SSD shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BCC:
$2.61B
SSD:
$8.20B
BCC:
$2.98
SSD:
$8.54
BCC:
24.38
SSD:
23.22
BCC:
0.42
SSD:
3.47
BCC:
1.30
SSD:
3.35
BCC:
$6.37B
SSD:
$2.38B
BCC:
$709.89M
SSD:
$1.08B
BCC:
$308.65M
SSD:
$568.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCC vs. SSD — Risk / Return Rank
BCC
SSD
BCC vs. SSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCC | SSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.19 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 1.47 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 2.73 | -3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCC vs. SSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCC drawdown since its inception was -67.67%, roughly equal to the maximum SSD drawdown of -68.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCC and SSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCC | SSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.67% | -68.16% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -20.38% | -9.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.47% | -34.40% | -22.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.47% | -44.50% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.47% | -44.50% | -11.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.61% | -6.31% | -45.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -16.36% | -6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.58% | 10.97% | +6.61% |
Volatility
BCC vs. SSD - Volatility Comparison
Boise Cascade Company (BCC) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD) have volatilities of 9.17% and 8.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCC | SSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.17% | 8.91% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.25% | 21.53% | +5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.34% | 30.50% | +7.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.86% | 31.41% | +9.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.73% | 32.31% | +9.42% |
Dividends
BCC vs. SSD - Dividend Comparison
BCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than SSD's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 1.21% | 1.17% | 4.90% | 6.73% | 5.84% | 7.61% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 5.45% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSD Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. | 0.59% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 1.15% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.55% | 1.76% |
Financials
BCC vs. SSD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boise Cascade Company and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCC vs. SSD - Profitability Comparison
BCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SSD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 265.89M and revenue of 587.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.2%.
BCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 27.79M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
SSD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 114.62M and revenue of 587.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
BCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
SSD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. reported a net income of 88.22M and revenue of 587.96M, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCC and SSD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCC has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to SSD (8.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCC dropped -67.67% vs SSD's -68.16%.
SSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCC and SSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer