WFG vs. WY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

WFG (West Fraser Timber Co Ltd) and WY (Weyerhaeuser Company) are both stocks. WFG operates in Lumber & Wood Production (Basic Materials), while WY operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, WFG returned 8.35%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for WY. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WFG vs. WY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) and Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFG achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than WY's 3.85% return. Over the past 10 years, WFG has outperformed WY with an annualized return of 8.35%, while WY has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return.

WFG

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 7.66%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 11.32%
• 1Y: -7.18%
• 3Y*: -0.08%
• 5Y*: -0.48%
• 10Y*: 8.35%

WY

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 3.85%
• 6M: 12.39%
• 1Y: -2.46%
• 3Y*: -2.78%
• 5Y*: -3.86%
• 10Y*: 1.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFG vs. WY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd	10.47%	-28.08%	2.80%	20.26%	-22.82%	49.57%	47.93%	-8.82%	-19.45%	73.52%
WY Weyerhaeuser Company	3.85%	-13.05%	-16.61%	18.04%	-20.44%	26.92%	13.04%	45.57%	-35.46%	21.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WFG and WY is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007	0.32

Over the past year, WFG and WY have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS WFG : -$19.47 WY : $0.73
PS Ratio WFG : 0.84 WY : 1.91
Total Revenue (TTM) WFG : $6.31B WY : $6.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) WFG : -$205.25M WY : $928.00M
EBITDA (TTM) WFG : -$89.14M WY : $999.00M

Return for Risk

WFG vs. WY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFG

WFG Risk / Return Rank: 30
WFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
WFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
WFG Omega Ratio Rank: 27
WFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
WFG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

WY

WY Risk / Return Rank: 33
WY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
WY Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
WY Omega Ratio Rank: 30
WY Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
WY Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFG vs. WY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) and Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WFG	WY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	-0.10	-0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.11	0.05	-0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.01	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.27	-0.15	-0.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	-0.32	-0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WFG vs. WY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFG Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the WY Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFG and WY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WFG	WY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	-0.10	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	-0.15	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.05	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.14	+0.03

Drawdowns

WFG vs. WY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFG drawdown since its inception was -83.25%, which is greater than WY's maximum drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFG and WY.

Drawdown Indicators

	WFG	WY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.25%	-75.69%	-7.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.37%	-21.96%	-3.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.68%	-37.98%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.68%	-43.02%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.66%	-61.69%	-16.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.65%	-33.72%	+2.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.92%	-21.91%	-9.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.47%	10.61%	+3.86%

Volatility

WFG vs. WY - Volatility Comparison

West Fraser Timber Co Ltd (WFG) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) at 7.48%. This indicates that WFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WFG	WY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.60%	7.48%	+3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.45%	18.65%	+4.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.78%	25.86%	+5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.97%	26.23%	+7.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.94%	32.18%	+7.76%

Dividends

WFG vs. WY - Dividend Comparison

WFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than WY's 2.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WFG West Fraser Timber Co Ltd	1.91%	2.09%	1.61%	1.40%	2.03%	0.59%	0.93%	1.37%	1.15%	0.41%	0.79%	0.74%
WY Weyerhaeuser Company	2.58%	3.55%	3.34%	4.77%	7.00%	2.87%	1.52%	4.50%	6.04%	3.55%	4.12%	4.00%

Financials

WFG vs. WY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between West Fraser Timber Co Ltd and Weyerhaeuser Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a gross profit of 23.38M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.3%.

WY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported a gross profit of 318.00M and revenue of 1.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.

WFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported an operating income of -288.80M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of -15.7%.

WY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported an operating income of 247.00M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.

WFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co Ltd reported a net income of -258.55M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of -14.1%.

WY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Weyerhaeuser Company reported a net income of 156.00M and revenue of 1.73B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WFG and WY in my portfolio?

WFG and WY have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WFG or WY?

WFG has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to WY (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFG dropped -83.25% vs WY's -75.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.