BBWI vs. LNG
BBWI (Bath & Body Works, Inc.) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. BBWI operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, BBWI returned -6.65%/yr vs 22.78%/yr for LNG. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BBWI vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBWI achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 24.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BBWI has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of -6.65%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 22.78% annualized return.
BBWI
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- -1.48%
- 6M
- -1.33%
- 1Y
- -22.74%
- 3Y*
- -19.94%
- 5Y*
- -16.60%
- 10Y*
- -6.65%
LNG
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.34%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
BBWI vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | -1.48% | -46.52% | -8.26% | 4.68% | -38.40% | 133.77% | 107.78% | -25.18% | -54.31% | -3.87% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 24.74% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBWI and LNG is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 1997 | 0.16 |
The correlation between BBWI and LNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BBWI:
$4.58
LNG:
$6.80
BBWI:
4.24
LNG:
35.48
BBWI:
0.42
LNG:
2.58
BBWI:
$7.25B
LNG:
$20.28B
BBWI:
$3.13B
LNG:
$5.52B
BBWI:
$1.36B
LNG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBWI vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
BBWI
LNG
BBWI vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBWI | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.05 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 0.15 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 0.31 | -1.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBWI vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBWI drawdown since its inception was -88.22%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBWI and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBWI | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.22% | -97.84% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.00% | -24.09% | -30.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.98% | -24.87% | -45.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.16% | -24.87% | -54.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.67% | -57.53% | -28.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.24% | -18.55% | -53.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.35% | -43.14% | +12.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.98% | 11.88% | +20.10% |
Volatility
BBWI vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) has a higher volatility of 18.68% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 7.19%. This indicates that BBWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBWI | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.68% | 7.19% | +11.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.03% | 21.49% | +17.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.34% | 27.02% | +29.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.65% | 30.27% | +20.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.62% | 32.50% | +22.12% |
Dividends
BBWI vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
BBWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than LNG's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | 4.12% | 3.98% | 2.06% | 1.85% | 1.90% | 22.61% | 0.81% | 6.62% | 9.35% | 3.99% | 6.68% | 4.17% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.90% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BBWI vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bath & Body Works, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BBWI vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison
BBWI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported a gross profit of 587.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BBWI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported an operating income of 231.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
BBWI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported a net income of 183.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBWI and LNG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBWI has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to LNG (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBWI dropped -88.22% vs LNG's -97.84%.
LNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBWI and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer