PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBUS vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBUS vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return.


BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBUS vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%19.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BBUS and VUG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.94

The correlation between BBUS and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBUS vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBUS
VUG

Technology

37.1%
53.5%

Financial Services

10.8%
4.3%

Communication Services

10.8%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
12.2%

Healthcare

8.1%
4.6%

Industrials

7.2%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
1.5%

Energy

3.2%
0.4%

Utilities

2.6%
0.9%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.0%

Basic Materials

1.2%
0.6%

Technology

BBUS
37.1%
VUG
53.5%

Financial Services

BBUS
10.8%
VUG
4.3%

Communication Services

BBUS
10.8%
VUG
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BBUS
9.4%
VUG
12.2%

Healthcare

BBUS
8.1%
VUG
4.6%

Industrials

BBUS
7.2%
VUG
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

BBUS
4.5%
VUG
1.5%

Energy

BBUS
3.2%
VUG
0.4%

Utilities

BBUS
2.6%
VUG
0.9%

Real Estate

BBUS
1.7%
VUG
1.0%

Basic Materials

BBUS
1.2%
VUG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBUS vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBUS vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBUSVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

1.69

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.76

5.92

+7.83

BBUS vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBUS and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBUSVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.77

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.68

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.62

+0.22

Drawdowns

BBUS vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBUSVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-50.68%

+15.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-16.53%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-22.85%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

-35.61%

+10.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-1.51%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-7.09%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

4.71%

-2.71%

Volatility

BBUS vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) is 2.88%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that BBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBUSVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

3.83%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.96%

12.11%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

15.84%

-3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

22.22%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

21.44%

-1.85%

BBUS vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBUS vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BBUS and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 15.11% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for VUG.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.03% for VUG.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBUS and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer