PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBUS vs. LSAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBUS vs. LSAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BBUS having a 10.60% return and LSAT slightly lower at 10.11%.


BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*

LSAT

1D
-0.59%
1M
2.09%
YTD
10.11%
6M
8.58%
1Y
10.20%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBUS vs. LSAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%11.62%
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
10.11%-1.54%18.16%13.64%-12.99%25.10%20.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BBUS and LSAT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between BBUS and LSAT has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BBUS vs. LSAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBUS
LSAT

Technology

37.1%
13.0%

Financial Services

10.8%
23.0%

Communication Services

10.8%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
23.9%

Healthcare

8.1%
6.2%

Industrials

7.2%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
3.3%

Energy

3.2%
3.0%

Utilities

2.6%

-

Real Estate

1.7%
3.1%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.8%

Technology

BBUS
37.1%
LSAT
13.0%

Financial Services

BBUS
10.8%
LSAT
23.0%

Communication Services

BBUS
10.8%
LSAT
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BBUS
9.4%
LSAT
23.9%

Healthcare

BBUS
8.1%
LSAT
6.2%

Industrials

BBUS
7.2%
LSAT
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

BBUS
4.5%
LSAT
3.3%

Energy

BBUS
3.2%
LSAT
3.0%

Utilities

BBUS
2.6%
LSAT

-

Real Estate

BBUS
1.7%
LSAT
3.1%

Basic Materials

BBUS
1.2%
LSAT
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBUS vs. LSAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LSAT
LSAT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
LSAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
LSAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBUS vs. LSAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBUSLSATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.15

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

1.29

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.76

3.03

+10.72

BBUS vs. LSAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the LSAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBUS and LSAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBUSLSATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

0.81

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.36

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.73

+0.10

Drawdowns

BBUS vs. LSAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, which is greater than LSAT's maximum drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and LSAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBUSLSATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.35%

-20.48%

-14.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-7.94%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-18.25%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

-20.48%

-4.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.59%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-5.55%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

3.37%

-1.37%

Volatility

BBUS vs. LSAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) is 2.88%, while Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that BBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBUSLSATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

3.26%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.96%

9.11%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

12.59%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.25%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

16.76%

+2.83%

BBUS vs. LSAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAT's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBUS vs. LSAT - Dividend Comparison

BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than LSAT's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
1.72%1.90%1.31%1.85%0.36%3.44%0.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBUS and LSAT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSAT has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs LSAT's -20.48%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 5.78% for LSAT. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 5.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LSAT.

LSAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.

BBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while LSAT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.99% for LSAT.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBUS and LSAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer