PortfoliosLab logo
LSAT vs. ESML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LSAT and ESML is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

LSAT vs. ESML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

LSAT:

4.18%

ESML:

16.42%

Max Drawdown

LSAT:

-0.01%

ESML:

-0.78%

Current Drawdown

LSAT:

-0.01%

ESML:

-0.13%

Returns By Period


LSAT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ESML

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LSAT vs. ESML - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ESML's 0.17% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LSAT vs. ESML — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LSAT is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LSAT is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LSAT is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LSAT is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LSAT is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LSAT is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ESML
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ESML is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ESML is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ESML is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ESML is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ESML is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ESML is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LSAT vs. ESML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

LSAT vs. ESML - Dividend Comparison

LSAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESML
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF
1.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LSAT vs. ESML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -0.01%, smaller than the maximum ESML drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and ESML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LSAT vs. ESML - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...