PortfoliosLab logo
LSAT vs. SGOV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LSAT and SGOV is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LSAT vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LSAT:

0.43

SGOV:

21.61

Sortino Ratio

LSAT:

0.60

SGOV:

472.39

Omega Ratio

LSAT:

1.08

SGOV:

473.39

Calmar Ratio

LSAT:

0.32

SGOV:

483.61

Martin Ratio

LSAT:

1.05

SGOV:

7,677.11

Ulcer Index

LSAT:

5.65%

SGOV:

0.00%

Daily Std Dev

LSAT:

17.67%

SGOV:

0.22%

Max Drawdown

LSAT:

-20.48%

SGOV:

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

LSAT:

-8.00%

SGOV:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSAT achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.72% return.


LSAT

YTD

-1.47%

1M

2.41%

6M

-7.52%

1Y

7.48%

3Y*

6.77%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SGOV

YTD

1.72%

1M

0.35%

6M

2.16%

1Y

4.81%

3Y*

4.54%

5Y*

2.74%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LSAT vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LSAT vs. SGOV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LSAT is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LSAT is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LSAT is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LSAT is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LSAT is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LSAT is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SGOV is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SGOV is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SGOV is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SGOV is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SGOV is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SGOV is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LSAT vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LSAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 21.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSAT and SGOV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LSAT vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than SGOV's 4.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
1.33%1.31%1.85%0.36%3.44%0.31%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
4.70%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%

Drawdowns

LSAT vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and SGOV.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LSAT vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that LSAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...