LSAT vs. SPY
LSAT (Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LSAT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Redwood, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. LSAT is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LSAT returned 6.45%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for SPY. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSAT charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
LSAT vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LSAT having a 9.79% return and SPY slightly lower at 9.74%.
LSAT
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 9.79%
- 6M
- 8.01%
- 1Y
- 10.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 6.45%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
LSAT vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 9.79% | -1.54% | 18.16% | 13.64% | -12.99% | 25.10% | 18.71% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 10.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSAT and SPY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2020 | 0.67 |
The correlation between LSAT and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LSAT vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LSAT
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
LSAT
SPY
Financial Services
LSAT
SPY
Technology
LSAT
SPY
Industrials
LSAT
SPY
Communication Services
LSAT
SPY
Healthcare
LSAT
SPY
Energy
LSAT
SPY
Real Estate
LSAT
SPY
Consumer Defensive
LSAT
SPY
Basic Materials
LSAT
SPY
Utilities
LSAT
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSAT vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
LSAT
SPY
LSAT vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSAT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.39 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 3.01 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.12 | 13.54 | -10.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSAT vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSAT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | -55.19% | +34.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.94% | -8.88% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.25% | -18.76% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.48% | -24.50% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -1.75% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -9.04% | +3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 1.97% | +1.41% |
Volatility
LSAT vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) is 3.34%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that LSAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSAT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 4.64% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 9.75% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 12.43% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 17.14% | -0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 17.99% | -1.24% |
LSAT vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSAT vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 1.73% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.85% | 0.36% | 3.44% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSAT and SPY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to LSAT (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSAT dropped -20.48% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.51% vs 6.45% for LSAT. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, LSAT has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.51% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LSAT.
LSAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
LSAT is categorized as Money Market, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Redwood and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LSAT and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSAT and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer