LSAT vs. FDMLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX).
LSAT is an actively managed fund by Redwood Investment Management. It was launched on Oct 27, 2020. FDMLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 6, 2012.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LSAT or FDMLX.
Key characteristics
| LSAT | FDMLX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.76% | 16.84% |
| 1Y Return | 33.75% | 32.43% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.06% | 10.41% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.56 | 2.15 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.60 | 3.05 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.44 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.01 | 3.90 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.51 | 12.54 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.14% | 2.60% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.99% | 15.14% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.48% | -35.03% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.77% | -1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSAT and FDMLX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LSAT vs. FDMLX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LSAT achieves a 22.76% return, which is significantly higher than FDMLX's 16.84% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSAT vs. FDMLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FDMLX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LSAT vs. FDMLX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LSAT vs. FDMLX - Dividend Comparison
LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than FDMLX's 1.88% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 1.51% | 1.85% | 0.36% | 3.44% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund | 1.88% | 2.40% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.40% | 3.20% | 2.73% | 1.57% | 1.27% | 7.44% | 5.77% | 3.70% |
Drawdowns
LSAT vs. FDMLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, smaller than the maximum FDMLX drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and FDMLX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LSAT vs. FDMLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) is 3.98%, while Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that LSAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDMLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.