PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LSAT vs. FDMLX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LSAT and FDMLX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.91%
-2.29%
LSAT
FDMLX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LSAT:

1.55

FDMLX:

0.23

Sortino Ratio

LSAT:

2.18

FDMLX:

0.42

Omega Ratio

LSAT:

1.27

FDMLX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

LSAT:

2.29

FDMLX:

0.07

Martin Ratio

LSAT:

6.51

FDMLX:

0.69

Ulcer Index

LSAT:

2.94%

FDMLX:

5.23%

Daily Std Dev

LSAT:

12.28%

FDMLX:

15.82%

Max Drawdown

LSAT:

-20.48%

FDMLX:

-57.30%

Current Drawdown

LSAT:

-3.97%

FDMLX:

-48.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSAT achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly lower than FDMLX's 3.95% return.


LSAT

YTD

2.85%

1M

3.19%

6M

7.91%

1Y

19.79%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FDMLX

YTD

3.95%

1M

4.34%

6M

-2.29%

1Y

4.79%

5Y*

-5.30%

10Y*

0.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LSAT vs. FDMLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FDMLX's 0.00% expense ratio.


LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
Expense ratio chart for LSAT: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for FDMLX: current value at 0.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LSAT vs. FDMLX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LSAT is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LSAT is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LSAT is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LSAT is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LSAT is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LSAT is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FDMLX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDMLX is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDMLX is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDMLX is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDMLX is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDMLX is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDMLX is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.550.23
The chart of Sortino ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 2.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.180.42
The chart of Omega ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.271.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.290.07
The chart of Martin ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 6.51, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.510.69
LSAT
FDMLX

The current LSAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the FDMLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSAT and FDMLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.55
0.23
LSAT
FDMLX

Dividends

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Dividend Comparison

LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than FDMLX's 2.20% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
1.27%1.31%1.85%0.36%3.44%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDMLX
Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund
2.20%2.29%2.40%3.06%2.57%2.40%3.20%2.73%1.57%1.27%7.44%5.77%

Drawdowns

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, smaller than the maximum FDMLX drawdown of -57.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and FDMLX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-3.97%
-48.31%
LSAT
FDMLX

Volatility

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) is 3.16%, while Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that LSAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDMLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.16%
3.53%
LSAT
FDMLX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab