PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LSAT vs. FDMLX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LSATFDMLX
YTD Return7.07%5.82%
1Y Return19.90%26.96%
3Y Return (Ann)4.61%8.47%
Sharpe Ratio1.361.89
Daily Std Dev13.94%13.90%
Max Drawdown-20.48%-35.03%
Current Drawdown-4.89%-3.70%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between LSAT and FDMLX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LSAT achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly higher than FDMLX's 5.82% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
59.58%
83.48%
LSAT
FDMLX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF

Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FDMLX's 0.00% expense ratio.


LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
Expense ratio chart for LSAT: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for FDMLX: current value at 0.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSAT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.001.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 4.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.62
FDMLX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDMLX, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDMLX, currently valued at 2.76, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.76
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FDMLX, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDMLX, currently valued at 2.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.002.67
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FDMLX, currently valued at 8.01, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.008.01

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which roughly equals the FDMLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LSAT and FDMLX.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.36
1.89
LSAT
FDMLX

Dividends

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Dividend Comparison

LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than FDMLX's 23.25% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
1.73%1.85%0.36%3.44%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDMLX
Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund
23.25%24.60%65.08%18.63%4.18%5.52%9.28%4.53%1.51%7.44%4.87%2.60%

Drawdowns

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, smaller than the maximum FDMLX drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and FDMLX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-4.89%
-3.70%
LSAT
FDMLX

Volatility

LSAT vs. FDMLX - Volatility Comparison

Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) have volatilities of 4.19% and 4.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4.19%
4.04%
LSAT
FDMLX