BBP vs. AMZA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBP (Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF) and AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBP is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index, while AMZA is a MLPs fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. BBP is passively managed, while AMZA is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, BBP returned 11.72%/yr vs 4.68%/yr for AMZA. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBP charges 0.79%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for AMZA.

Performance

BBP vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBP achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 23.85% return. Over the past 10 years, BBP has outperformed AMZA with an annualized return of 11.72%, while AMZA has yielded a comparatively lower 4.68% annualized return.

BBP

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: -0.92%
• YTD: 8.38%
• 6M: 9.14%
• 1Y: 48.00%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 10.90%
• 10Y*: 11.72%

AMZA

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 23.85%
• 6M: 20.59%
• 1Y: 21.48%
• 3Y*: 22.62%
• 5Y*: 19.73%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBP vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF	8.38%	33.15%	3.32%	17.88%	0.85%	-8.17%	22.24%	24.73%	-13.95%	24.07%
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	23.85%	0.17%	30.90%	23.35%	33.20%	51.22%	-49.25%	6.27%	-26.78%	-6.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BBP and AMZA is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2014	0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between BBP and AMZA has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BBP vs. AMZA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBP	AMZA
Healthcare	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	99.8%
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

BBP vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBP

BBP Risk / Return Rank: 70
BBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
BBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BBP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BBP Martin Ratio Rank: 82

AMZA

AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 34
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 32
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBP vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBP	AMZA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.23	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	1.77	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.21	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.20	1.77	+3.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.27	4.47	+11.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBP vs. AMZA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBP Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the AMZA Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBP and AMZA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBP	AMZA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.23	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.77	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.13	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	-0.02	+0.42

Drawdowns

BBP vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBP drawdown since its inception was -44.32%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBP and AMZA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBP	AMZA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.32%	-91.46%	+47.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	-12.16%	+2.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.09%	-18.56%	-7.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.28%	-25.15%	-13.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.32%	-86.84%	+42.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.18%	-8.99%	+4.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.02%	-45.01%	+32.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	4.82%	-1.86%

Volatility

BBP vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison

Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) at 5.93%. This indicates that BBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBP	AMZA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.03%	5.93%	+2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.52%	13.37%	+5.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.84%	17.66%	+6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.37%	25.85%	+0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.41%	37.24%	-9.83%

BBP vs. AMZA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZA's 2.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBP vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison

BBP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	7.92%	8.81%	7.29%	9.40%	7.65%	10.24%	22.13%	19.47%	34.46%	24.16%	18.36%	18.21%
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.18%	0.00%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBP and AMZA in my portfolio?

BBP and AMZA have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBP or AMZA?

BBP has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to AMZA (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBP dropped -44.32% vs AMZA's -91.46%.

Which ETF is better, BBP or AMZA?

On 10-year performance, BBP leads with 11.72% vs 4.68% for AMZA. On fees, BBP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AMZA has been the lower-risk option at 5.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBP or AMZA?

Over the 10-year period, BBP has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBP or AMZA?

BBP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBP or AMZA?

AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 7.92%, compared with 0.00% for BBP.

What is the main difference between BBP and AMZA?

BBP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while AMZA is MLPs. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBP and 2.01% for AMZA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.