BBP vs. SBIO
BBP (Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF) and SBIO (ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - BBP tracks the LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index while SBIO tracks the S-Network Medical Breakthroughs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BBP returned 13.55%/yr vs 11.14%/yr for SBIO. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SBIO.
Performance
BBP vs. SBIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BBP having a 14.66% return and SBIO slightly lower at 14.53%. Over the past 10 years, BBP has outperformed SBIO with an annualized return of 13.55%, while SBIO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.14% annualized return.
BBP
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 57.44%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.55%
SBIO
- 1D
- 6.44%
- 1M
- 10.06%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 95.53%
- 3Y*
- 23.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.14%
BBP vs. SBIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF | 14.66% | 33.15% | 3.32% | 17.88% | 0.85% | -8.17% | 22.24% | 24.73% | -13.95% | 24.07% |
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 14.53% | 55.07% | 3.81% | 8.68% | -28.08% | -17.55% | 21.17% | 50.30% | -11.81% | 45.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBP and SBIO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2014 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BBP and SBIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBP vs. SBIO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBP
SBIO
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
BBP
SBIO
Basic Materials
BBP
-
SBIO
-
Communication Services
BBP
-
SBIO
-
Consumer Cyclical
BBP
-
SBIO
-
Consumer Defensive
BBP
-
SBIO
-
Energy
BBP
-
SBIO
-
Financial Services
BBP
-
SBIO
Industrials
BBP
-
SBIO
-
Real Estate
BBP
-
SBIO
-
Technology
BBP
-
SBIO
-
Utilities
BBP
-
SBIO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBP vs. SBIO — Risk / Return Rank
BBP
SBIO
BBP vs. SBIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBP | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.48 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.22 | 7.59 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.33 | 21.16 | -1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBP vs. SBIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBP drawdown since its inception was -44.32%, smaller than the maximum SBIO drawdown of -63.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBP and SBIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBP | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.32% | -63.06% | +18.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -12.66% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.09% | -42.44% | +16.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.89% | -53.10% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.32% | -63.06% | +18.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.33% | +4.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.98% | -28.37% | +16.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 4.53% | -1.55% |
Volatility
BBP vs. SBIO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) is 6.39%, while ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) has a volatility of 11.14%. This indicates that BBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBP | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 11.14% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.86% | 23.77% | -4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.98% | 30.46% | -6.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 33.75% | -7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.42% | 33.23% | -5.81% |
BBP vs. SBIO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBP vs. SBIO - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBP nor SBIO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 1.29% |
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.55% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 2.79% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBP and SBIO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIO has higher volatility (11.14%) compared to BBP (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBP dropped -44.32% vs SBIO's -63.06%.
On 10-year performance, BBP leads with 13.55% vs 11.14% for SBIO. On fees, SBIO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BBP has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BBP has performed better with a 13.55% return vs 11.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SBIO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBP.
BBP and SBIO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BBP tracks LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index, while SBIO tracks S-Network Medical Breakthroughs Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBP and 0.50% for SBIO.
SBIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBP and SBIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer