PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIN vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBIN vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIN achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.


BBIN

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.28%
YTD
8.64%
6M
10.96%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIN vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
8.64%31.86%3.65%18.54%-14.29%11.74%7.91%3.14%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIN and XMMO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2019

0.69

The correlation between BBIN and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBIN vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBIN
XMMO

Financial Services

24.8%
2.4%

Industrials

16.6%
41.1%

Technology

12.5%
16.7%

Healthcare

9.0%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
4.6%

Basic Materials

5.0%
7.2%

Communication Services

3.2%
1.6%

Energy

3.0%
7.7%

Utilities

1.7%
5.8%

Real Estate

0.3%
6.1%

Financial Services

BBIN
24.8%
XMMO
2.4%

Industrials

BBIN
16.6%
XMMO
41.1%

Technology

BBIN
12.5%
XMMO
16.7%

Healthcare

BBIN
9.0%
XMMO
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

BBIN
5.9%
XMMO
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BBIN
5.4%
XMMO
4.6%

Basic Materials

BBIN
5.0%
XMMO
7.2%

Communication Services

BBIN
3.2%
XMMO
1.6%

Energy

BBIN
3.0%
XMMO
7.7%

Utilities

BBIN
1.7%
XMMO
5.8%

Real Estate

BBIN
0.3%
XMMO
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIN vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIN
BBIN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIN vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBINXMMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.99

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

2.77

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

4.45

-2.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.96

18.21

-11.25

BBIN vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIN and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBINXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.99

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.78

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.58

-0.04

Drawdowns

BBIN vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIN drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIN and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBINXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-55.37%

+22.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-8.34%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-24.93%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.24%

-27.91%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

0.00%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-9.45%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.04%

+1.07%

Volatility

BBIN vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) is 5.15%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that BBIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBINXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

7.82%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

15.54%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

18.71%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

21.45%

-4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

22.27%

-3.15%

BBIN vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIN has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBIN vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

BBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
3.63%3.87%3.41%3.20%2.83%3.54%1.07%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBIN and XMMO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to BBIN (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIN dropped -33.37% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 5-year performance, XMMO leads with 16.69% vs 8.51% for BBIN. On fees, BBIN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BBIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 16.69% return vs 8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBIN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

BBIN has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

BBIN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. BBIN tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBIN and 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIN and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer