PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBEU vs. FEDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBEU vs. FEDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBEU having a 6.77% return and FEDM slightly higher at 6.95%.


BBEU

1D
1.18%
1M
2.36%
YTD
6.77%
6M
9.98%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*

FEDM

1D
0.86%
1M
2.92%
YTD
6.95%
6M
8.83%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBEU vs. FEDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
6.77%36.37%1.85%20.31%-14.72%3.71%
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
6.95%26.85%2.85%17.39%-15.25%1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEU and FEDM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021

0.95

The correlation between BBEU and FEDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBEU vs. FEDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBEU
FEDM

Financial Services

21.8%
27.1%

Industrials

14.8%
17.8%

Healthcare

10.7%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
7.1%

Technology

7.7%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
5.7%

Basic Materials

4.5%
5.9%

Energy

3.4%
5.7%

Utilities

3.0%
3.5%

Communication Services

2.8%
4.6%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.8%

Financial Services

BBEU
21.8%
FEDM
27.1%

Industrials

BBEU
14.8%
FEDM
17.8%

Healthcare

BBEU
10.7%
FEDM
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

BBEU
8.4%
FEDM
7.1%

Technology

BBEU
7.7%
FEDM
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BBEU
4.7%
FEDM
5.7%

Basic Materials

BBEU
4.5%
FEDM
5.9%

Energy

BBEU
3.4%
FEDM
5.7%

Utilities

BBEU
3.0%
FEDM
3.5%

Communication Services

BBEU
2.8%
FEDM
4.6%

Real Estate

BBEU
0.3%
FEDM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBEU vs. FEDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEU
BBEU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FEDM
FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEU vs. FEDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBEUFEDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.20

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.41

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

5.07

+0.71

BBEU vs. FEDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the FEDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEU and FEDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBEUFEDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.04

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.47

+0.01

Drawdowns

BBEU vs. FEDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEU drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, which is greater than FEDM's maximum drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEU and FEDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBEUFEDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

-29.37%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-11.92%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-14.24%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.16%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-6.99%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

3.30%

-0.01%

Volatility

BBEU vs. FEDM - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) at 4.71%. This indicates that BBEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBEUFEDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

4.71%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

12.47%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

16.14%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

16.46%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

16.46%

+2.86%

BBEU vs. FEDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FEDM's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBEU vs. FEDM - Dividend Comparison

BBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, which matches FEDM's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
2.78%2.83%4.16%2.94%4.72%2.63%2.29%3.24%0.49%
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
2.80%2.97%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBEU and FEDM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBEU has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to FEDM (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEU dropped -36.27% vs FEDM's -29.37%.

On 3-year performance, BBEU leads with 17.22% vs 14.54% for FEDM. On fees, BBEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FEDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BBEU has performed better with a 17.22% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for FEDM.

FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 2.78% for BBEU.

BBEU is categorized as Europe Equities, while FEDM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. BBEU tracks Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index, while FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBEU and 0.12% for FEDM.

BBEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBEU and FEDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer