BAMO vs. BAMD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAMO (Brookstone Opportunities ETF) and BAMD (Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAMO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Brookstone, while BAMD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BAMO returned 14.18% vs 7.69% for BAMD. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BAMO charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BAMD.

Performance

BAMO vs. BAMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMO achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than BAMD's 8.13% return.

BAMO

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 2.97%
• YTD: 5.83%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 14.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMD

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 8.13%
• 6M: 8.26%
• 1Y: 7.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMO vs. BAMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	5.83%	9.16%	14.39%	7.75%
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	8.13%	-1.33%	19.76%	10.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMO and BAMD is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.44

BAMO vs. BAMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BAMO	BAMD
Technology	29.2%	13.0%
Financial Services	17.1%	26.8%
Industrials	11.4%	4.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	3.2%
Healthcare	10.4%	4.2%
Communication Services	7.8%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	12.8%
Energy	3.3%	15.6%
Basic Materials	2.6%	2.6%
Utilities	1.6%	12.6%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.6%

Return for Risk

BAMO vs. BAMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMO

BAMO Risk / Return Rank: 67
BAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

BAMD

BAMD Risk / Return Rank: 22
BAMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BAMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
BAMD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
BAMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BAMD Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMO vs. BAMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) and Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAMO	BAMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	0.72	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	1.09	+2.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.13	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	1.11	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.17	2.91	+9.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAMO vs. BAMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the BAMD Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMO and BAMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAMO	BAMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	0.72	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.48	1.04	+0.44

Drawdowns

BAMO vs. BAMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMO drawdown since its inception was -12.72%, smaller than the maximum BAMD drawdown of -15.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMO and BAMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAMO	BAMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.72%	-15.91%	+3.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	-6.99%	+1.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-1.45%	+0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-4.29%	+3.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	2.65%	-1.48%

Volatility

BAMO vs. BAMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO) is 1.76%, while Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF (BAMD) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that BAMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAMO	BAMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.76%	2.47%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.45%	6.83%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.35%	10.77%	-4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.57%	13.35%	-3.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.57%	13.35%	-3.78%

BAMO vs. BAMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMO has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAMO vs. BAMD - Dividend Comparison

BAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than BAMD's 3.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMD Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF	3.56%	3.86%	4.21%	0.70%
BAMO Brookstone Opportunities ETF	1.46%	1.54%	1.58%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAMO and BAMD in my portfolio?

BAMO and BAMD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAMO or BAMD?

BAMD has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to BAMO (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAMO dropped -12.72% vs BAMD's -15.91%.

Which ETF is better, BAMO or BAMD?

On 1-year performance, BAMO leads with 14.18% vs 7.69% for BAMD. On fees, BAMD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMO has been the lower-risk option at 1.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAMO or BAMD?

Over the 1-year period, BAMO has performed better with a 14.18% return vs 7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAMO or BAMD?

BAMD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for BAMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAMO or BAMD?

BAMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 1.46% for BAMO.

What is the main difference between BAMO and BAMD?

BAMO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while BAMD is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for BAMO and 0.95% for BAMD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.